Economic Evaluations of Rehabilitation Interventions: A Scoping Review with Implications for Return to Work Programs
- PMID: 40427988
- PMCID: PMC12111396
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13101152
Economic Evaluations of Rehabilitation Interventions: A Scoping Review with Implications for Return to Work Programs
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The use of rehabilitation interventions is critical in addressing health and economic outcomes, including return to work (RTW) facilitation for individuals with disabilities. However, the economic evaluation of these interventions has been found to lack consistency, with limited adherence to reporting standards and little focus on integrated approaches. This scoping review will map the existing evidence on the economic evaluations of rehabilitation interventions and their implications for return to work (RTW) programs. Methods: A systematic search of databases, such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify studies that provided full economic evaluations of rehabilitation interventions related to RTW. Using the PRISMA-ScR framework, 11 studies were ultimately included. Data extraction included the model type, cost-effectiveness models, adherence to CHEERS reporting guidelines, and implications for RTW. Results: The majority of studies examined medical or psychological interventions, with little representation of vocational or integrated approaches. ICERs differed greatly between studies based on methodologies and healthcare settings. The reporting of heterogeneity, uncertainty analysis, and societal perspectives were some of the gaps identified from adherence to CHEERS guidelines. Conclusions: Economic evaluations show that rehabilitation interventions can be cost-effective for improving RTW outcomes. Future research priorities include interdisciplinary approaches, standardized methodologies, and studies based on LMICs to address global disparities.
Keywords: cost-effectiveness; economic evaluation; rehabilitation; return to work.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Treger I., Kosto A., Vadas D., Friedman A., Lutsky L., Kalichman L. Crafting the Future of Community-Based Medical Rehabilitation: Exploring Optimal Models for Non-Inpatient Rehabilitation Services through a Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2024;21:1332. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101332. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Maccarone M.C., Masiero S., Papathanasiou J., Panayotov K., Kashilskah Y., Prokopidis K., Papanastasiou C., Tyllianakis M., Dionyssiotis Y. Frailty Education: Promoting Geriatric Competencies among Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residents. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2023;102:E137–E140. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002231. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Toledo C., Vera A., Leija L., Gutierrez J. The Importance of Rehabilitation for COVID-19 Sequelae; Proceedings of the 2021 Global Medical Engineering Physics Exchanges/Pan American Health Care Exchanges (GMEPE/PAHCE); Sevilla, Spain. 15–20 March 2021; Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE; 2021. pp. 1–5.
-
- Walsh T.S., Salisbury L.G., Merriweather J.L., Boyd J.A., Griffith D.M., Huby G., Kean S., Mackenzie S.J., Krishan A., Lewis S.C., et al. Increased Hospital-Based Physical Rehabilitation and Information Provision After Intensive Care Unit Discharge. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015;175:901. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0822. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
