Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 14;15(10):1238.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101238.

Clinical Predictors and Risk Factors of Gleason Score Upgrade: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Affiliations

Clinical Predictors and Risk Factors of Gleason Score Upgrade: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Carmine Sciorio et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: In prostate cancer (PCa) patients, discrepancies between biopsy-assigned Gleason Scores and those determined from surgical specimens are frequently reported. This phenomenon, known as Gleason score upgrade (GSU), can have significant clinical implications. This work aims to understand the factors contributing to GSU for refining prostate cancer management strategies. Methods: Data from 779 patients diagnosed with histologically confirmed PCa who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary care institution between January 2005 and December 2020 were examined. Results: In the univariable setting, 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) use was associated with a higher percentage of upgrading (42.3% vs. 30.4% among non-users; p = 0.03942). A more advanced pathological T stage (p = 0.01114) and lymph node positivity (p < 0.00001) correlated significantly with GSU. In the logistic regression model, advanced pathological stage increased the odds more than twofold (OR = 2.807, p = 0.00135). 5-ARI use was associated with notably higher odds of upgrading (OR = 3.809, p = 0.00004). Younger age slightly increased the likelihood of GSU (OR = 0.951 per year increase in age, p = 0.01101). Conclusions: Younger age, advanced pathological stage, and the use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors were identified as significant predictors of GSU.

Keywords: Gleason score; Gleason score upgrade; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT-style flow diagram illustrating patient selection and inclusion criteria.

Similar articles

References

    1. Mirone V., Imbimbo C., Arcaniolo D., Franco M., La Rocca R., Venturino L., Spirito L., Creta M., Verze P. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards prostate cancer screening amongst men living in the southern Italian peninsula: The Prevention and Research in Oncology (PRO) non-profit Foundation experience. World J. Urol. 2017;35:1857–1862. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2074-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crocetto F., Barone B., Caputo V.F., Fontana M., de Cobelli O., Ferro M. BRCA Germline Mutations in Prostate Cancer: The Future Is Tailored. Diagnostics. 2021;11:908. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050908. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Catalona W.J., Bigg S.W. Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Evaluation of results after 250 patients. J. Urol. 1990;143:538–543; discussion 544. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)40013-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anguas-Gracia A., Antón-Solanas I., Echániz-Serrano E., Subirón-Valera A.B., Rodríguez-Roca B., Juárez-Vela R., Satustegui-Dordá P.J., Fernández-Rodríguez M.T., Gea-Caballero V., Tejada-Garrido C.I., et al. Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy: A Longitudinal Study. Nurs. Rep. 2023;13:1051–1063. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13030092. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klein E.A., Bianco F.J., Serio A.M., Eastham J.A., Kattan M.W., Pontes J.E., Vickers A.J., Scardino P.T. Surgeon Experience is Strongly Associated with Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy for all Preoperative Risk Categories. J. Urol. 2008;179:2212–2217. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.107. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources