Clinical Predictors and Risk Factors of Gleason Score Upgrade: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
- PMID: 40428230
- PMCID: PMC12110525
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15101238
Clinical Predictors and Risk Factors of Gleason Score Upgrade: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
Abstract
Background: In prostate cancer (PCa) patients, discrepancies between biopsy-assigned Gleason Scores and those determined from surgical specimens are frequently reported. This phenomenon, known as Gleason score upgrade (GSU), can have significant clinical implications. This work aims to understand the factors contributing to GSU for refining prostate cancer management strategies. Methods: Data from 779 patients diagnosed with histologically confirmed PCa who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at a single tertiary care institution between January 2005 and December 2020 were examined. Results: In the univariable setting, 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) use was associated with a higher percentage of upgrading (42.3% vs. 30.4% among non-users; p = 0.03942). A more advanced pathological T stage (p = 0.01114) and lymph node positivity (p < 0.00001) correlated significantly with GSU. In the logistic regression model, advanced pathological stage increased the odds more than twofold (OR = 2.807, p = 0.00135). 5-ARI use was associated with notably higher odds of upgrading (OR = 3.809, p = 0.00004). Younger age slightly increased the likelihood of GSU (OR = 0.951 per year increase in age, p = 0.01101). Conclusions: Younger age, advanced pathological stage, and the use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors were identified as significant predictors of GSU.
Keywords: Gleason score; Gleason score upgrade; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Mirone V., Imbimbo C., Arcaniolo D., Franco M., La Rocca R., Venturino L., Spirito L., Creta M., Verze P. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards prostate cancer screening amongst men living in the southern Italian peninsula: The Prevention and Research in Oncology (PRO) non-profit Foundation experience. World J. Urol. 2017;35:1857–1862. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2074-9. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anguas-Gracia A., Antón-Solanas I., Echániz-Serrano E., Subirón-Valera A.B., Rodríguez-Roca B., Juárez-Vela R., Satustegui-Dordá P.J., Fernández-Rodríguez M.T., Gea-Caballero V., Tejada-Garrido C.I., et al. Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy: A Longitudinal Study. Nurs. Rep. 2023;13:1051–1063. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13030092. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Klein E.A., Bianco F.J., Serio A.M., Eastham J.A., Kattan M.W., Pontes J.E., Vickers A.J., Scardino P.T. Surgeon Experience is Strongly Associated with Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy for all Preoperative Risk Categories. J. Urol. 2008;179:2212–2217. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.107. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
