Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 17;61(5):908.
doi: 10.3390/medicina61050908.

Multimodal Prehabilitation in Major Abdominal Surgery-Rationale, Modalities, Results and Limitations

Affiliations
Review

Multimodal Prehabilitation in Major Abdominal Surgery-Rationale, Modalities, Results and Limitations

George Andrei Popescu et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Recent evidence revealed that an adequate preoperative physiological reserve is crucial to overcome surgical stress response. Consequently, a new concept, called prehabilitation, emerged, aiming to improve the preoperative functional reserve of patients who will undergo major abdominal surgery. During the interval between diagnosis and surgery, a multimodal approach consisting of physical exercise and nutritional and psychological support could be employed to enhance physiologic reserve. Physical activity interventions aim to improve aerobic capacity, muscle strength and endurance. Nutritional support addressing malnutrition and sarcopenia also contributes to the achievement of the above-mentioned goals, particularly in patients undergoing cancer-related procedures. Psychological interventions targeting anxiety, depression and self-efficacy, as well as risk behavior modification (e.g., smoking cessation) seem to enhance recovery. However, there is a lack of standardization regarding these interventions, and the evidence about the impact of this multidisciplinary approach on the postoperative outcomes is still contradictory. This narrative review focuses on the physiological basis of surgical stress response and on the efficacy of prehabilitation, reflected mainly in the length of hospitalization and rates of postoperative complications. Multidisciplinary collaboration between surgeons, nutritionists, psychologists and physiotherapists was identified as the key to the success of prehabilitation programs. Synergizing prehabilitation and ERAS protocols significantly improves short-term surgical outcomes. Recent well-designed, randomized clinical trials revealed that this approach not only enhanced functional reserve, but also decreased the rates of postoperative complications and enhanced patient's overall quality of life, emphasizing the importance of its implementation in routine, elective, surgical care.

Keywords: abdominal surgery; enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); exercise intervention; nutritional support; physiological reserve; prehabilitation; surgical stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neuro-endocrine and immunologic mechanisms involved in surgical stress response.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pathway of the surgical patient to enhance recovery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Synergistical effects of multimodal prehabilitation methods.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flowchart of search results.

References

    1. Gillis C., Carli F. Promoting Perioperative Metabolic and Nutritional Care. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:1455–1472. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000795. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gillis C., Ljungqvist O., Carli F. Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? A narrative review. Br. J. Anaesth. 2022;128:434–448. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soeters P.B., Grimble R.F. Dangers, and benefits of the cytokine mediated response to injury and infection. Clin. Nutr. 2009;28:583–596. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. English K.L., Paddon-Jones D. Protecting muscle mass and function in older adults during bed rest. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2010;13:34–39. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328333aa66. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arends J., Bachmann P., Baracos V., Barthelemy N., Bertz H., Bozzetti F., Fearon K., Hütterer E., Isenring E., Kaasa S., et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin. Nutr. 2017;36:11–48. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources