Saving the Meniscus: A Retrospective Observational Study of the Incidence, Treatment, and Failure Rate of the Main Meniscal Tear Types at 24-Month Follow-Up
- PMID: 40429345
- PMCID: PMC12111877
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm14103350
Saving the Meniscus: A Retrospective Observational Study of the Incidence, Treatment, and Failure Rate of the Main Meniscal Tear Types at 24-Month Follow-Up
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in repair techniques, the failure rates of meniscal surgery are still high. The seven most common tear types-horizontal cleavage tears (HCTs), radial tears (RTs), meniscal ramp lesions (MRLs), meniscal root tears (MRTs), longitudinal tears (LTs), bucket-handle tears (BHMTs), and complex meniscal tears (CMTs)-were reviewed. The present retrospective observational study aimed to analyze their characteristics, incidence, treatment approach and failure rates of a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing meniscal arthroscopic repair. Methods: The database of a high-volume meniscal suture center was examined for lesions managed by all-inside, inside-out, outside-in, or transtibial pull-out techniques from January 2018 to September 2022. Demographic (gender, age at surgery, laterality of the affected knee) and intraoperative data (tear type/site, repair technique, and suture number/combination) were collected in order to calculate the failure rates of the cohort and of each tear type and suture technique. Results: Altogether, 636 procedures met our criteria of having at least a 2-year follow-up. The overall failure rate was 1.98%. The most frequent lesions were HCTs (41.98%), with most injuries being in the body/posterior horn (88.52%) of the right knee (56.92%). Treatment predominantly (92.50%) included all-inside sutures. All-inside repair had the highest failure rate (2.98%), followed by inside-out (1.56%) repair (p = 1.0), whereas outside-in and pull-out techniques never failed. Failure rates by lesion included BHMTs (7.27%), HCTs (2.25%), CMTs (1.49%), and LTs (1.25%); RMT, RML, and MRT repair were always successful. Conclusions: Findings at two years suggest that 1-3 all-inside sutures minimize MRL failure, whereas three or more all-inside sutures or combined techniques seem to be effective for HCTs, LTs, and RTs but not BHMTs. Pull-out repair worked best for complete tears/avulsion types of MRTs, whereas all-inside sutures effectively managed partial lesions. Results for CMTs were inconclusive.
Keywords: bucket-handle meniscal tear; complex meniscal tears; failure rate; horizontal cleavage tear; longitudinal tear; meniscal ramp lesions; meniscal root tear; meniscus; radial tear; suture.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Inside-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Oct 3;14(4):e22.00037. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00037. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024. PMID: 39364325 Free PMC article.
-
Arthroscopic meniscal repair with use of the outside-in technique.Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:195-206. Instr Course Lect. 2000. PMID: 10829175 Review.
-
What Is the Failure Rate After Arthroscopic Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6):1742-1752. doi: 10.1177/03635465211015425. Epub 2021 Jun 23. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 34161741
-
Comparable Outcomes After Bucket-Handle Meniscal Repair and Vertical Meniscal Repair Can Be Achieved at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3104-3110. doi: 10.1177/0363546517719244. Epub 2017 Aug 14. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28806092
-
Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2653-2660. doi: 10.1177/0363546518786035. Epub 2018 Aug 2. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 30070592
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous