Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985 Jul;144(2):186-90.
doi: 10.1007/BF00451911.

Development of the intestinal flora in very low birth weight infants compared to normal full-term newborns

Comparative Study

Development of the intestinal flora in very low birth weight infants compared to normal full-term newborns

H Sakata et al. Eur J Pediatr. 1985 Jul.

Abstract

Development of faecal flora was studied in seven very low birth weight (VLBW) infants, who were fed on human milk and whose birth weights ranged from 810-1350 g. The intestine of the VLBW infants was first colonised by enterobacteria and streptococci, as it was in full-term infants. VLBW infants differed, however, from full-term infants in that both types of organism continued to be predominant for a longer period, and establishment of bifidobacterial flora was retarded. Bifidobacteria first appeared in the stools of VLBW infants at a mean age of 10.6 +/- 2.7 days and became predominant at a mean of 19.8 +/- 8.9 days, in contrast to full-term, breast-fed infants in whom bifidobacterial flora appeared at as early as 4 days of age. The delay seemed to be related to the low milk intake of the VLBW infants. The number of viable staphylococci in the stools of VLBW infants was generally higher than that in full-term infants. Although emergence of Bacteroides, Clostridium and lactobacilli was delayed compared with full-term infants, differences in their occurrence and prevalence between VLBW and full-term infants were not remarkable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1977 Nov;30(11):1799-810 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 1983 Sep;72(3):317-21 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1977 Aug;91(2):298-301 - PubMed
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1971 Sep;69(3):405-11 - PubMed
    1. Jpn J Microbiol. 1970 Jan;14(1):65-72 - PubMed

Publication types