Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 29;13(5):480.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050480.

Antibody Response Against SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein in People with HIV After COVID-19 Vaccination

Affiliations

Antibody Response Against SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein in People with HIV After COVID-19 Vaccination

María José Muñoz-Gómez et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: People with HIV (PWH) often have a suboptimal response to vaccines, raising concerns regarding the efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in this population. We aimed to evaluate the humoral immune response to the B.1 lineage and Omicron variant in PWH on antiretroviral therapy (ART) following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 19 PWH on ART who received a two-dose series of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and a booster six months later. Participants without HIV infection (n = 25) were included as a healthy control (HC) group. The humoral response to the COVID-19 vaccine (anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgG levels and ability to block ACE2-S interaction) against both the original B.1 lineage and the Omicron variant was assessed using immunoassays. Results: The humoral response in PWH was very strong (geometric mean fold rise, GMFR > 8) after the second dose and strong (GMFR > 4) after the booster dose for both the B.1 lineage and the Omicron variant. We found comparable humoral responses to the B.1 lineage and Omicron variant between PWH and HC groups after the second and booster doses (q-value > 0.05). The COVID-19 vaccine generated a significantly weaker humoral response against the Omicron variant compared to the B.1 lineage in both groups (q-value < 0.05). However, this response improved after the booster dose, although it remained weaker in PWH. Conclusions: PWH showed a strong humoral response to the COVID-19 vaccine against B.1 and Omicron, though the Omicron response was weaker than B.1. Booster doses in PWH improved the Omicron response, but it stayed lower than B.1. Findings confirm vaccine effectiveness in PWH, stressing the critical role of boosters and potential need for updated vaccines for variants like Omicron.

Keywords: HIV; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; spike glycoprotein; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders played no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine (anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgG and inhibition of ACE2-S interaction) between study groups against the B.1 lineage and the Omicron variant after the second (A) and a booster dose (B) of the COVID-19 vaccine. Statistics: The graph shows the geometric means and 95% confidence intervals in gray lines. p-values were calculated using generalized linear mixed models. Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; PWH, people with HIV; Log10, base-10 logarithm; AUC, area under the curve; IgG, immunoglobulin G.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine (anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgG and inhibition of ACE2-S interaction) between SARS-CoV-2 variants in study groups after the second (A) and booster dose (B) of the COVID-19 vaccine. Statistics: The graph shows the geometric means and 95% confidence intervals in gray lines. p-values were calculated using generalized linear mixed models. Significant differences are shown in bold. Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; PWH, people with HIV; Log10, base-10 logarithm; AUC, area under the curve; IgG, immunoglobulin G.

Similar articles

References

    1. Deeks S.G. HIV infection, inflammation, immunosenescence, and aging. Annu. Rev. Med. 2011;62:141–155. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042909-093756. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy I., Rahav G. The effect of HIV on COVID-19 vaccine responses. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS. 2023;18:135–141. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000790. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Höft M.A., Burgers W.A., Riou C. The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in people with HIV. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2024;21:184–196. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-01087-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Favara G., Barchitta M., Maugeri A., Faro G., Agodi A. HIV infection does not affect the risk of death of COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. J. Glob. Health. 2022;12:05036. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05036. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertagnolio S., Thwin S.S., Silva R., Nagarajan S., Jassat W., Fowler R., Haniffa R., Reveiz L., Ford N., Doherty M., et al. Clinical features of, and risk factors for, severe or fatal COVID-19 among people living with HIV admitted to hospital: Analysis of data from the WHO Global Clinical Platform of COVID-19. Lancet HIV. 2022;9:e486–e495. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00097-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources