Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 13:16:1481641.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1481641. eCollection 2025.

The development and psychometric evaluation of specific problem lists reflecting psychosocial distress of patients before and after solid organ transplantation

Evamaria Müller  1 , Martin Härter  1 , Sanna Higgen  1 , Markus J Barten  2 , Doreen Eickhoff  1 , Florian Grahammer  3 , Nele Reinsberg  4   5 , Martina R Sterneck  6   7 , Angela Buchholz  1
Affiliations

The development and psychometric evaluation of specific problem lists reflecting psychosocial distress of patients before and after solid organ transplantation

Evamaria Müller et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Psychosocial distress is common in patients before and after solid organ transplantation. Regular screening facilitates the early identification of distressed patients and the provision of appropriate professional care. However, feasible screening tools that address the specific problems of transplant patients are missing. Thus, the aim of this mixed methods study was to develop transplant-specific problem lists for patients before (transplant candidates) and after (transplant recipients) solid organ transplantation which can be used as a quick and easily applicable screening tool for psychosocial distress.

Method: An electronic database search resulted in a preliminary item list including 36 problems common in transplant candidates and 44 problems in transplant recipients. A total of N = 117 patients and N = 48 health care providers participated in a paper-pencil survey to assess the relevance and comprehensibility of the problem lists. Qualitative interviews about the clarity and completeness of problem lists were performed with N = 58 patients and N = 3 transplant nurses. Data analysis included the calculation of descriptive statistics and content analysis of interviews and survey open response fields. To test the concurrent validity of the problem list for patients, patients completed the problem list in combination with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCNN) distress thermometer and a short form of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) as part of routine care.

Results: The finalized list for transplant candidates includes 21 items and the list for transplant recipients 22 items, each covering four categories: problems in everyday life, social problems, worries and anxieties, physical and psychological problems. In the course of the study, sufficient data was gathered only from transplant recipients (N = 100). The number of problems endorsed by transplant recipients correlated significantly with measures of depression and distress (distress: r = 0.41, p < 0.001; PHQ-4: r = 0.63, p < 0.001; PHQ-2: r = 0.53, p < 0.001; GAD-2: r = 0.60, p < 0.001). The developed problem lists cover relevant psychosocial problems and can help to identify distress in patients before and after transplantation.

Discussion: The problem list for transplant recipients showed sufficient concurrent validity, psychometric properties of the problem list for transplant candidates should be investigated in further studies.

Keywords: end-stage disease; psychosocial distress; screening; solid organ transplantation; transplant recipients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow of participation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achille M. A., Ouellette A., Fournier S., Vachon M., Hebert M. J. (2006). Impact of stress, distress and feelings of indebtedness on adherence to immunosuppressants following kidney transplantation. Clin. Transpl. 20, 301–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00478.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adang E. M. M., Kootstra G., Engel G. L., van Hooff J. P., Merckelbach H. L. G. J. (1998). Do retrospective and prospective quality of life assessments differ for pancreas-kidney transplant recipients? Transpl. Int. 11, 11–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.1998.tb00949.x, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alanazi A. K., Lynch-Kelly D., Weaver M., Lyon D. E. (2023). A scoping review of psychological distress instruments in women with early-stage breast cancer during chemotherapy. Cancer Rep. 6:e1833. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1833, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Annema C., Roodbol P. F., Stewart R. E., Porte R. J., Ranchor A. V. (2015). Prevalence of psychological problems and associated transplant-related variables at different time periods after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 21, 524–538. doi: 10.1002/lt.24075, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baranyi A., Krauseneck T., Rothenhäusler H.-B. (2013). Overall mental distress and health-related quality of life after solid-organ transplantation results from a retrospective follow-up study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 11:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-15, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources