Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 13:16:1548481.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1548481. eCollection 2025.

Microecological mechanisms of mountainous forest cultivated ginseng growth vigor and saponin accumulation, and the characterization of bionic microbial fertilizer

Affiliations

Microecological mechanisms of mountainous forest cultivated ginseng growth vigor and saponin accumulation, and the characterization of bionic microbial fertilizer

Fengyu Pang et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Introduction: A study on the soil microecological mechanisms influencing the growth vigor and saponin accumulation of mountainous forest cultivated ginseng (MFCG) under various forest types.

Methods: Using MFCG from different forest types as experimental material, the correlation and functional analysis of MFCG growth vigor, ginseng saponin content, and soil nutrient elements in their rhizosphere were conducted to clarify the soil microecological mechanisms by which different forest types affect the growth vigor and saponin accumulation of understory ginseng. Based on these microecological mechanisms, a bionic microbial fertilizer was developed and characterized.

Results: The agronomic traits and saponin content (Re, Rc, Rb2, and Rb3) of MFCG in the Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica Litv. (PSV) group were significantly higher than those in the Quercus mongolica Fisch. ex Ledeb. (QMF) and Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Kuzen (LGK) groups (p < 0.05). The total content of these four monomeric saponins in the PSV group was 35.1 and 45.56% higher than that in the QMF and LGK groups, respectively. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the PSV group and the QMF and LGK groups in terms of the rhizosphere soil microbial diversity and physicochemical indicators such as nutrient elements. The agronomic traits and saponin content of MFCG were positively correlated with chemical indicators in the rhizosphere soil, including Cu, Ca, Mg, Zn, B, Fe, Mo, Mn, Organic matter (OM), Available phosphorus (AP), Available nitrogen (AN), and Available potassium (AK). Based on the microbial diversity and nutrient elements positively correlated with MFCG in the rhizosphere soil, a bionic microbial fertilizer formula was optimized.

Discussion: The microecological mechanism behind the growth vigor and saponin accumulation of understory ginseng involves an increase in beneficial microorganisms and nutrient elements, along with a reduction in harmful microorganisms and detrimental elements. The bionic microbial fertilizer promoted MFCG growth and saponin accumulation while improving soil nutrient levels, bulk density, and water-holding capacity.

Keywords: bionic microbial fertilizer; ginseng; growth vigor; microecological mechanisms; saponin accumulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A–G) Agronomic traits of MFCG. Different letters above the plots indicate significant differences between treatments (n = 20).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The concentrations of nine major ginsenosides in MFCG. (A–D) High-performance liquid chromatogram of ginsenosides detected from MFCG. S, Standard curves of nine ginsenosides; 1–9: Rg1, Re, Rf, Rb1, Rg2, Rc, Rb2, Rb3, Rd. detected from ginseng. (E–N) Ginsenoside content of MFCG. Different letters above the plots indicate significant differences between treatments (n = 4).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of different forest types on the diversity of rhizosphere microbial communities in MFCG. (A1,A2) Venn diagrams of OTUs for soil fungi and bacteria, respectively. (B1–B4) ACE index, Chao 1 index, Shannon index, Simpson index for fungi. (B5–B8) ACE index, Chao 1 index, Shannon index, Simpson index for bacterias (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, n = 4). (C1,C2) PCoA results of fungal and bacterial communities, respectively (p < 0.05, n = 4).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Analysis of soil microbial community composition and dominant communities among different forest types MFCG rhizosphere soil under different. (Α1,A2) Cumulative histograms of fungi and bacterial community composition (relative abundance (%) of ASVs at the phylum level). (B1,B2) Intergroup ANOVA of the top ten fungi and top ten bacteria with highest relative abundance at the genus level, respectively. Different letters above the plots indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05, n = 4).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Functional predictions of fungi and bacteria in the rhizosphere soil of ginseng under different forest types. (A1–A3) Functions of fungal communities predicted by FUNGuild. (B1) Level 1 Functional prediction of bacterial communities. (B2) Level 2 Functional prediction of bacterial communities. (B3) Level 3 Functional prediction of bacterial communities (n = 4).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Correlation between Ginsenoside content, agronomic traits and rhizosphere microbial community based on Spearman’s correlation coefficient. (A1,A2) Analysis of the relationship between the top 10 fungi and bacteria and ginsenosides. (B1,B2) Analysis of the relationship between the top 10 fungi and bacteria and ginseng agronomic traits. RFW, Root fresh weight; RT, Root thickness; ST, Stem thickness; LW, Leaf width; PH, Plant height; LL, Leaf length; MRL, Main root length. (C1,C2) Correlation analysis of the chemical properties of MFCG rhizosphere soil with ginsenoside content and agronomic traits, respectively. OM, organic matter; AN, available nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; AK, available potassium; Asterisks denote significant differences (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, n = 4).

Similar articles

References

    1. Ali Q., Ali M., Jing H., Hussain A., Manghwar H., Ali M., et al. . (2024). Power of plant microbiome: a sustainable approach for agricultural resilience. Plant Stress 14:100681. doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2024.100681 - DOI
    1. Aqeel M., Ran J., Hu W., Irshad M. K., Dong L., Akram M. A., et al. . (2023). Plant-soil-microbe interactions in maintaining ecosystem stability and coordinated turnover under changing environmental conditions. Chemosphere 318:137924. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137924, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bai B., Liu W., Qiu X., Zhang J., Zhang J., Bai Y. (2022). The root microbiome: community assembly and its contributions to plant fitness. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 64, 230–243. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13226 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhuyan S., Yadav M., Giri S. J., Begum S., Das S., Phukan A., et al. . (2023). Microliter spotting and micro-colony observation: a rapid and simple approach for counting bacterial colony forming units. J. Microbiol. Methods 207:106707. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2023.106707 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bidar G., Pelfrêne A., Schwartz C., Waterlot C., Sahmer K., Marot F., et al. . (2020). Urban kitchen gardens: effect of the soil contamination and parameters on the trace element accumulation in vegetables – a review. Sci. Total Environ. 738:139569. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139569 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources