Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84905.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.84905. eCollection 2025 May.

Discharging Patients With Pending Microbiology Cultures: A Narrative Review of Safety and Best Practices

Affiliations
Review

Discharging Patients With Pending Microbiology Cultures: A Narrative Review of Safety and Best Practices

George Bechir et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Discharging patients with pending microbiology culture results from the hospital has become a common practice aimed at improving hospital throughput and reducing length of stay. One of the main contributors to prolonged hospitalization is the delay in receiving finalized culture results, especially when patients are clinically stable and ready for discharge. Consequently, many hospitals have explored strategies to safely discharge patients before culture results are finalized. While this approach may help alleviate bed shortages and reduce healthcare costs, it raises important patient safety concerns. Finalized culture results may reveal pathogens or resistance patterns that necessitate changes in antimicrobial therapy. Without timely review and action, these findings can lead to missed diagnoses, suboptimal treatment, or avoidable readmissions. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on the safety, clinical impact, and system-level strategies associated with discharging patients with pending culture results. Studies show that 2%-11% of pending cultures in hospitalized patients require a change in clinical management, yet documentation of these pending results is often missing from discharge summaries, and follow-up responsibility is frequently unclear. Vulnerable populations, such as older adults and those discharged to subacute care facilities, are particularly at risk due to fragmented transitions and limited outpatient monitoring. Adverse outcomes in these groups include delayed therapy adjustments, inappropriate antimicrobial use, and increased healthcare utilization. To address these risks, several interventions have shown promise. These include electronic health record (EHR)-based alerts, pharmacist-led stewardship programs, and auto-populated discharge summary tools. When integrated into standardized discharge workflows and supported by institutional policy, these interventions improve follow-up rates and reduce harm. Systematic reviews of hospital discharge practices emphasize that multidisciplinary approaches, combining clinical teams, pharmacists, and care transition services, are most effective in ensuring timely review and response to finalized results. In conclusion, discharging patients with pending microbiology cultures can be safe when supported by structured systems that ensure results are reviewed and acted upon after discharge. Hospitals should implement protocols that clearly document pending tests, assign follow-up responsibility, and utilize EHR tools to facilitate communication. These strategies enhance both patient safety and operational efficiency during the vulnerable transition from inpatient to outpatient care.

Keywords: antibiotic stewardship; discharge communication; electronic medical records; hospital discharge safety; microbiology follow-up; patient safety; pending culture results; post-discharge care; quality improvement; test result management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, Ladak-Merchant Z, Johnson RE, Maviglia SM, Gandhi TK. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:121–128. - PubMed
    1. Incidence and predictors of microbiology results returning postdischarge and requiring follow-up. El-Kareh R, Roy C, Brodsky G, Perencevich M, Poon EG. J Hosp Med. 2011;6:291–296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walz SE. University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2012. Pending microbiology cultures at hospital discharge and post-hospital patient outcomes in Medicare patients discharged to sub-acute care.
    1. Pending laboratory tests and the hospital discharge summary in patients discharged to sub-acute care. Walz SE, Smith M, Cox E, Sattin J, Kind AJ. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:393–398. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pending studies at hospital discharge: a pre-post analysis of an electronic medical record tool to improve communication at hospital discharge. Kantor MA, Evans KH, Shieh L. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:312–318. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources