Variations in Duration of Clinical Follow-up After Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Survey of POSNA and SRS Membership

Abstract

Background: There are currently no evidence-based guidelines addressing the optimal duration of follow-up after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Despite the safety and efficacy of PSF for AIS, long-term complications exist, including infection, pseudoarthrosis, adjacent segment disease, deformity progression, persistent pain, and junctional deformities. In this study, we describe practice variation existing among surgeons regarding duration and intervals of patient follow-up after surgical treatment of AIS in addition to factors influencing provider recommendations for duration of radiographic and clinical follow-up. This investigation of practice variation is important, as opportunities exist for both limiting unnecessary radiation exposure, while also identifying opportunities for timely intervention to help decrease the morbidity of late complications arising after spinal fusion.Methods: An anonymous online survey was created and subsequently distributed to members of POSNA and SRS to assess practice demographics and surgeon opinions surrounding duration of surveillance following surgery for AIS. Only surgeons who treated at least five operative AIS cases within the past year were included. Descriptive statistics and comparative sub-analyses are presented.Results: Forty-nine participants met inclusion criteria. Respondents were mainly pediatric orthopaedic surgeons (92%) in practice for 21-50 years (49%) who performed approximately 21-50 operative AIS cases per year (49%). Forty-eight percent of providers had an age limit in their practice, and 52% regularly followed operative AIS patients over 18 years of age. Sixty-two percent of surgeons followed operative AIS patients for 2-5 years postoperatively, whereas only 4% followed for more than 10 years. The most cited factors impacting follow-up recommendations were junctional deformities, adjacent segment disease, and symptomatic implants. There were no significant associations between years in practice, operative volume, and recommendations for duration of follow-up after routine operative AIS cases.Conclusions: Significant variability in duration of follow-up after PSF for AIS exists. Although most patients are clinically followed for 2 years after surgery, only a small percentage of providers follow AIS patients for more than 10 years postoperatively. Numerous AIS revisions occur more than 5 years after the index surgery. Further investigations to determine the optimal duration of surveillance following PSF for AIS should be conducted.Level of Evidence: V.

Key concepts: •Late complications following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) may occur 5-10 years after the index surgery and currently, there are no guidelines that outline the optimal duration of postoperative follow-up.•Significant variability exists in pediatric orthopaedic provider recommendations for long-term follow-up after PSF for AIS and is not associated with surgeon experience or case volume.•Most providers follow operative AIS patients for 1-2 years postoperatively, and only a small minority follow operative AIS patients for more than 10 years after the index surgery.•Persistent back pain, junctional deformity, and symptomatic implants are the most common factors affecting provider recommendations for duration of follow-up.•These survey findings may be useful for pediatric orthopaedic providers to operatively manage AIS patients in determining the need and frequency for routine radiographic and/or clinical follow-up.

Figure 1

Approximate total operative AIS cases per year reported by survey respondents.

Figure 2

Clinical experience of survey respondents.

Figure 3

Provider preference for duration of follow-up following spinal fusion for AIS.

Figure 4

Factors affecting duration and frequency of follow-up after spinal fusion for AIS.