Wide-Detector CT-Based optimized triple Rule-Out CT angiography for emergency chest pain: reducing contrast and radiation without compromising diagnostic quality
- PMID: 40434554
- PMCID: PMC12328532
- DOI: 10.1007/s10140-025-02351-4
Wide-Detector CT-Based optimized triple Rule-Out CT angiography for emergency chest pain: reducing contrast and radiation without compromising diagnostic quality
Abstract
Background: The triple rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO-CTA) has recently emerged as a technique that noninvasively evaluates the coronary arteries (CAs), the pulmonary arteries (PAs) and the thoracic aorta (TA).
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of an optimized scanning protocol to reduce the volume of iodine contrast media (ICM), injection rate, and radiation dose in patients undergoing TRO-CTA.
Methods: Patients undergoing TRO-CTA were assigned to either group A or group B using a 16 cm wide-detector CT. Patients in group A were imaged with a traditional triple scanning protocol with a sequence of the PA, CAs, and TA. Patients in group B were imaged using the modified protocol with scanning sequence of PA, TA, and CAs, ICM of 55 ml, and injection rate of 4.5 mL/s. The image quality and effective radiation dose (ED) were compared.
Results: There were no significant differences in basic information between groups A and B. Other than the left PA, RA, and RV, there were no significant differences in the CT attenuation values of relevant vascular structures between groups A and B. There were no significant differences in CNR values between the two groups except the LAD-D and LCX. The image quality scores were comparable between groups A and B except the CAs. However, there were significant differences between the two groups in ICM (p < 0.05), scanning time (p < 0.001) and ED (p = 0. 023).
Conclusions: The optimized TRO-CTA scanning protocol can achieve less ICM and lower ED while maintaining image quality.
Keywords: Image quality; Iodine contrast media; Radiation dose; Tomography; Triple rule-out.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical Committee of Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest among the authors involved in this study.
Figures
References
-
- DeLaney MC, Neth M, Thomas JJ (2017) Chest pain triage: current trends in the emergency departments in the united States. J Nucl Cardiol 24:2004–2011. 10.1007/s12350-016-0578-0 - PubMed
-
- Wnorowski AM, Halpern EJ (2016) Diagnostic yield of Triple-Rule-Out CT in an emergency setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:295–301. 10.2214/AJR.15.15717 - PubMed
-
- Henzler T, Gruettner J, Meyer M et al (2013) Coronary computed tomography and triple rule out CT in patients with acute chest pain and an intermediate cardiac risk for acute coronary syndrome: part 2: economic aspects. Eur J Radiol 82:106–111. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.012 - PubMed
-
- Chae MK, Kim EK, Jung KY et al (2016) Triple rule-out computed tomography for risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10:291–300. 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.06.002 - PubMed
-
- Monica MP, Merkely B, Szilveszter B et al (2020) Computed tomographic angiography for risk stratification in patients with acute chest Pain - The triple Rule-out concept in the emergency department. Curr Med Imaging Rev 16:98–110. 10.2174/1573405614666180604095120 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
