Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 28.
doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02686-5. Online ahead of print.

Treatment pathways of lipid-lowering therapies in Germany 2016-2022

Julius L Katzmann  1 , Claudia Grellmann  2 , Beate Leppert  3 , Irina Müller-Kozarez  4 , Martin Schulz  5   6 , Ulrich Laufs  4
Affiliations

Treatment pathways of lipid-lowering therapies in Germany 2016-2022

Julius L Katzmann et al. Clin Res Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of effective LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering drugs, only a minority of patients achieves the guideline-recommended treatment targets. This analysis describes treatment pathways of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in Germany.

Methods: Health claims data were used to identify patients at high or very-high cardiovascular risk who received a LLT prescription 2016-2022. Treatment pathways and the time to switch or discontinue LLT were analysed for statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid (BA), and PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i).

Results: Out of 3,487,827 insured persons, 247,529 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequent first-line LLT were statins in 96.3%. Ezetimibe, BA, and PCSK9i were first-line LLT in only 0.9%, 0.061%, and 0.046%, respectively. Only few patients experienced a change in their treatment regimen following LLT initiation. Prescriptions of BA and PCSK9i were mainly second-, third-, or fourth-line add-on treatment. Termination of treatment with BA and PCSK9i was less frequent compared to statins and ezetimibe. The median time to treatment discontinuation was 1.45, 1.04, 0.60, and 2.45 years for statins, ezetimibe, BA, and PCSK9i, respectively, and the median time to switch therapy was 4.81 and 4.87 years for ezetimibe and PCSK9i, respectively (median not reached for statins and BA).

Conclusions: Changes in LLT were only observed in a minority of patients. BA and PCSK9i were switched more frequently than statins and ezetimibe. BA was discontinued earlier, and PCSK9i later than the other agents. Continued efforts to maintain long-term adherence and overcome therapeutic inertia are needed to realise the potential of available LLT with proven cardiovascular benefit.

Keywords: Bempedoic acid; Ezetimibe; PCSK9 inhibitor; Statin; Therapeutic inertia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: JLK: honoraria and travel grants from Daiichi Sankyo, honoraria from Novartis, honoraria from Synlab, travel grants from Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim. CG: employed at Institute for Applied Health Services Research GmbH (inav) and paid consultant of Daiichi Sankyo for designing the study and carrying out the analyses. BL: employed at Gesundheitsforen Leipzig GmbH and paid consultant of Daiichi Sankyo for designing the study and carrying out the analyses. IMK: honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Sobi, Astra Zeneca. MS: honoraria from BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, TAD, CSL Vifor. UL: honoraria from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, and Sanofi.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, Chapman MJ, de Backer GG, Delgado V, Ference BA, Graham IM, Halliday A, Landmesser U, Mihaylova B, Pedersen TR, Riccardi G, Richter DJ, Sabatine MS, Taskinen M-R, Tokgozoglu L, Wiklund O (2020) 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J 41:111–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parhofer KG, Laufs U (2023) Lipid profile and lipoprotein(a) testing. Dtsch Arztebl Int 120:582–588. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0150 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ray KK, Reeskamp LF, Laufs U, Banach M, Mach F, Tokgözoğlu LS, Connolly DL, Gerrits AJ, Stroes ESG, Masana L, Kastelein JJP (2022) Combination lipid-lowering therapy as first-line strategy in very high-risk patients. Eur Heart J 43:830–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab718 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cannon CP, Khan I, Klimchak AC, Reynolds MR, Sanchez RJ, Sasiela WJ (2017) Simulation of lipid-lowering therapy intensification in a population with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. JAMA Cardiol 2:959–966. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2289 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Blaum C, Seiffert M, Goßling A, Kröger F, Bay B, Lorenz T, Braetz J, Graef A, Zeller T, Schnabel R, Clemmensen P, Westermann D, Blankenberg S, Brunner FJ, Waldeyer C (2021) The need for PCSK9 inhibitors and associated treatment costs according to the 2019 ESC dyslipidaemia guidelines vs. the risk-based allocation algorithm of the 2017 ESC consensus statement: a simulation study in a contemporary CAD cohort. Eur J Prev Cardiol 28:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa088 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources