Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2025 Jul 1;160(7):772-781.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1386.

Familiarity of the Surgeon-Anesthesiologist Dyad and Major Morbidity After High-Risk Elective Surgery

Julie Hallet  1   2 , Angela Jerath  3   4   5   6 , Pablo Perez d'Empaire  5   6 , François Martin Carrier  7   8 , Alexis F Turgeon  9   10 , Daniel I McIsaac  11 , Chris Idestrup  5   6 , Gianni Lorello  6   12   13 , Alana Flexman  14   15 , Biniam Kidane  16 , Wing C Chan  4 , Anna Gombay  3 , Natalie Coburn  1   2   3   4 , Antoine Eskander  2   3   4   17 , Rinku Sutradhar  4   18
Affiliations
Comment

Familiarity of the Surgeon-Anesthesiologist Dyad and Major Morbidity After High-Risk Elective Surgery

Julie Hallet et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: The surgeon-anesthesiologist teamwork is a core component of performance in the operating room, which can influence patient outcomes.

Objective: To examine the association between surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad familiarity (as dyad volume, the number of procedures done together) with 90-day postoperative major morbidity for high-risk elective surgery.

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study used administrative health care data from Ontario, Canada. Participants included high-risk elective operations (cardiac, low- and high- risk gastrointestinal [GI], genitourinary, gynecology oncology, neurosurgery, orthopedic, spine, vascular, and head and neck) from 2009 through 2019. Data were analyzed from January 2009 to March 2020.

Exposure: Dyad familiarity, as the annual volume of procedures done by the surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad in 4 years prior to index surgery.

Main outcomes and measures: 90-day major morbidity (any Clavien-Dindo grade 3 to 5). The association between exposure and outcome was examined using multivariable logistic regression, stratified by type of procedure.

Results: Among 711 006 index procedures, the median dyad volume and rate of 90-day major morbidity varied by type of procedure. There was higher median volume and dyad consistency for cardiac, orthopedic, and lung surgery. For other procedures, the median dyad volume was low (3 or less procedures per dyad per year). An independent association was observed between dyad volume and 90-day major morbidity for high-risk GI surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96), low-risk GI surgery (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98), gynecology oncology surgery (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and spine surgery (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99), after adjusting for hospital setting, hospital, surgeon and anesthesiologist volume, and patient age, sex, and comorbidity burden. The adjusted associations were not significant for other types of procedures.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, increasing familiarity of the surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad was associated with improved postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing low- and high-risk GI surgery, gynecology oncology surgery, and spine surgery. For each additional time that a unique surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad worked together, the odds of 90-day major morbidity decreased by 4% for low-risk GI surgery, 8% for high-risk GI surgery, 3% for gynecology oncology surgery, and 3% for spine surgery. Additional research is needed to determine the most effective care structures that harness the benefits of surgeon-anesthesiologist familiarity to potentially improve patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Flexman reported grants from Michael Smith Health Research BC during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Wolters Kluwer, Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society, the University of Manitoba, the University of Ottawa, the Mayo Clinic, and the Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care Society of the United Kingdom and grants from Eisai Co and the Society for Cardiovascular Anesthesiology outside the submitted work. Dr Kidane reported consultant fees from Olympus, J & J, Medtronic outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment on

References

    1. Cooper JB. Critical role of the surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship for patient safety. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(3):402-405. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002324 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lingard L, Regehr G, Espin S, et al. Perceptions of operating room tension across professions: building generalizable evidence and educational resources. Acad Med. 2005;80(10)(suppl):S75-S79. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200510001-00021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz JD. Conflict and its resolution in the operating room. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19(2):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.07.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almquist M. Proper staffing improves outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2022;157(9):816. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2799 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, Fairweather N. Interruptions and miscommunications in surgery: an observational study. AORN J. 2012;95(5):576-590. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2012.02.012 - DOI - PubMed