Priming the primary motor cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation: Effect on learning the golf putt
- PMID: 40434982
- PMCID: PMC12118825
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324983
Priming the primary motor cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation: Effect on learning the golf putt
Abstract
Background: Priming the primary motor cortex (M1) with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) prior to motor practice modulates post-synaptic activity, thereby impacting learning of a motor skill. This effect has been shown for the acquisition of simple motor skills. It is not clear whether priming tDCS can impact the learning/retention of a more naturalistic motor task.
Objective/hypothesis: We investigated the effects of priming M1 with tDCS on the performance on a golf putting task. We hypothesized that participants who receive tDCS with the cathode over M1 (C-M1) would show better skill acquisition and retention performance, relative to participants who receive tDCS with the anode over M1 (A-M1) or sham tDCS.
Methods: Thirty-six participants were randomized into three groups: C-M1, A-M1, and sham tDCS. Participants received tDCS (1mA, 20 minutes) prior to practicing golf putting across two days. Performance (error) was measured for each putt. Participants returned on the third day for a retention test.
Results: After accounting for baseline performance, the C-M1 group performed significantly better compared to A-M1 [p = 0.02] and sham tDCS [p = 0.01] at the retention test. There was no difference in retention performance between A-M1 and sham tDCS.
Conclusion: Our findings partially support the Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro rule of metaplasticity. C-M1 tDCS priming enhanced motor learning, while A-M1 tDCS priming had no effect, relative to sham.
Copyright: © 2025 Mangat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Does tDCS Enhance Complex Motor Skill Acquisition? Evidence from a Golf-Putting Task.Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;25(14):4297. doi: 10.3390/s25144297. Sensors (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40732424 Free PMC article.
-
Utilizing transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance laparoscopic technical skills training: A randomized controlled trial.Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):863-872. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 19. Brain Stimul. 2020. PMID: 32289719 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Preconditioning tDCS facilitates subsequent tDCS effect on skill acquisition in older adults.Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Mar;51:31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Dec 1. Neurobiol Aging. 2017. PMID: 28033506
-
Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals.Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Apr;47(7):779-789. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13866. Epub 2018 Mar 6. Eur J Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29443433
-
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy elderly individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Somatosens Mot Res. 2025 Mar;42(1):17-27. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2024.2310851. Epub 2024 Feb 6. Somatosens Mot Res. 2025. PMID: 38319133
References
-
- Schmidt RA. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2011. pp. 602 Available from: http://archive.org/details/motorcontrollear0000schm_r6c5
-
- Tsumoto T. Long-term potentiation and long-term depression in the neocortex. Prog Neurobiol. 1992;39(2):209–28. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources