Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Interference and Artifacts in High-content Screening

In: Assay Guidance Manual [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; 2004.
.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Interference and Artifacts in High-content Screening

Jayme L. Dahlin et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

Since the late 1990s, high-content screening (HCS) approaches have contributed greatly to cell and chemical biology, drug discovery, and toxicology research. Despite the numerous advantages of multi-parameter interrogation of cell models using HCS approaches, these assay formats are also susceptible to artifacts and interference. This chapter describes 1) autofluorescence interference contributed by media, cells, and tissues which may complicate or preclude HCS assay development, 2) interference by environmental or microorganism contaminants, and 3) compound-mediated autofluorescence, fluorescence quenching, and cellular injury/cytotoxicity which may obscure whether compounds modulate the desired target or cellular phenotype or may produce false-positives or -negatives. It provides best-practice recommendations for identifying and mitigating such interference through the application of experimental design strategies, statistics, orthogonal, and counter-screens, and the use of reference compounds. Adoption of these recommendations should enhance the quality of chemical matter identified by HCS assays.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Johnston PA. Redox cycling compounds generate H2O2 in HTS buffers containing strong reducing reagents—real hits or promiscuous artifacts? Curr Opin Chem Biol (Internet). 2011 Feb (cited 2023 Sep 18);15(1):174–82. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1367593110001584 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inglese J, Johnson RL, Simeonov A, Xia M, Zheng W, Austin CP, et al. High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. Nat Chem Biol (Internet). 2007 Aug (cited 2023 Sep 18);3(8):466–79. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nchembio.2007.17 - PubMed
    1. Johnston PA, Johnston PA. Cellular platforms for HTS: three case studies. Drug Discov Today (Internet). 2002 Mar (cited 2023 Sep 18);7(6):353–63. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359644601021407 - PubMed
    1. Thorne N, Auld DS, Inglese J. Apparent activity in high-throughput screening: origins of compound-dependent assay interference. Curr Opin Chem Biol (Internet). 2010 Jun (cited 2023 Sep 18);14(3):315–24. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1367593110000463 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thorne N, Inglese J, Auld DS. Illuminating Insights into Firefly Luciferase and Other Bioluminescent Reporters Used in Chemical Biology. Chem Biol (Internet). 2010 Jun (cited 2023 Sep 18);17(6):646–57. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1074552110001973 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources