Interference and Artifacts in High-content Screening
- PMID: 40435339
- Bookshelf ID: NBK615088
Interference and Artifacts in High-content Screening
Excerpt
Since the late 1990s, high-content screening (HCS) approaches have contributed greatly to cell and chemical biology, drug discovery, and toxicology research. Despite the numerous advantages of multi-parameter interrogation of cell models using HCS approaches, these assay formats are also susceptible to artifacts and interference. This chapter describes 1) autofluorescence interference contributed by media, cells, and tissues which may complicate or preclude HCS assay development, 2) interference by environmental or microorganism contaminants, and 3) compound-mediated autofluorescence, fluorescence quenching, and cellular injury/cytotoxicity which may obscure whether compounds modulate the desired target or cellular phenotype or may produce false-positives or -negatives. It provides best-practice recommendations for identifying and mitigating such interference through the application of experimental design strategies, statistics, orthogonal, and counter-screens, and the use of reference compounds. Adoption of these recommendations should enhance the quality of chemical matter identified by HCS assays.
Sections
- Abstract
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Cells and media
- Seeding and growing cells
- Labels and probe choices
- Image acquisition considerations
- Analysis
- Observations and insights from compound treatments
- Confirmation and follow-up
- Conclusions
- Appendix 1: Derivation of the Z-score
- Appendix 2: Analysis of cytotoxic and autofluorescent compounds in the ToxCast compound collection
- Glossary
- Suggested readings (alphabetical order)
- Suggested resources
- Acknowledgements
- Conflicting interests
- References
- Appendix Figures and Table
References
-
- Johnston PA. Redox cycling compounds generate H2O2 in HTS buffers containing strong reducing reagents—real hits or promiscuous artifacts? Curr Opin Chem Biol (Internet). 2011 Feb (cited 2023 Sep 18);15(1):174–82. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1367593110001584 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Inglese J, Johnson RL, Simeonov A, Xia M, Zheng W, Austin CP, et al. High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. Nat Chem Biol (Internet). 2007 Aug (cited 2023 Sep 18);3(8):466–79. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nchembio.2007.17 - PubMed
-
- Johnston PA, Johnston PA. Cellular platforms for HTS: three case studies. Drug Discov Today (Internet). 2002 Mar (cited 2023 Sep 18);7(6):353–63. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359644601021407 - PubMed
-
- Thorne N, Auld DS, Inglese J. Apparent activity in high-throughput screening: origins of compound-dependent assay interference. Curr Opin Chem Biol (Internet). 2010 Jun (cited 2023 Sep 18);14(3):315–24. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1367593110000463 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Thorne N, Inglese J, Auld DS. Illuminating Insights into Firefly Luciferase and Other Bioluminescent Reporters Used in Chemical Biology. Chem Biol (Internet). 2010 Jun (cited 2023 Sep 18);17(6):646–57. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1074552110001973 - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources