Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 27;15(5):e094254.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094254.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the rehabilitation enablement in chronic heart failure facilitated self-care rehabilitation intervention for people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and their caregivers: rationale and protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial - REACH-HFpEF trial

Affiliations

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the rehabilitation enablement in chronic heart failure facilitated self-care rehabilitation intervention for people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and their caregivers: rationale and protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial - REACH-HFpEF trial

Rod S Taylor et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common and causes functional limitation, poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and impairs prognosis. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is a promising intervention for HFpEF, but there is currently insufficient evidence to support its routine use. This trial will assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a 12-week health professional-facilitated, home-based rehabilitation intervention (REACH-HF), in people with HFpEF, for participants and their caregivers.

Methods and analysis: REACH-HFpEF is a parallel two group multicentre randomised controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation to the REACH-HF intervention plus usual care (intervention group) or usual care alone (control group) with a target sample size of 372 participants with HFpEF and their caregivers recruited from secondary care centres in United Kingdom. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed blinded; outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 4-month and 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome measure will be patients' disease-specific HRQoL, measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include patient's exercise capacity, psychological well-being, level of physical activity, generic HRQoL, self-management, frailty, blood biomarkers, mortality, hospitalisations, and serious adverse events, and caregiver's HRQoL and burden. A process evaluation and substudy will assess the fidelity of intervention delivery and adherence to the home-based exercise regime and explore potential mediators and moderators of changes in HRQoL with the intervention. Qualitative studies will describe facilitators' experiences of delivery of the intervention. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the REACH-HF intervention in participants with HFpEF will estimate incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year at 12 months. The CEA will be conducted from a UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective and a wider societal perspective. The adequacy of trial recruitment in an initial 6-month internal pilot period will also be checked.

Ethics and dissemination: The study is approved by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (ref 21/WS/0085). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journal publication and conference presentations to researchers, service users and policymakers.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN47894539.

Keywords: Heart failure; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; Self Care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of study flow. *Dependent on number of caregivers recruited.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Patient with HFpEF inclusion and exclusion criteria. BMP, body mass index; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CR, cardiac rehabilitation; HF, heart failure; NYHA, New York Heart Association.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Summary of the study schedule. ISWT, Incremental Shuttle Walk Test; MLWHFQ, Minnesota Living with Health Failure Questionnaire; KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; SF-12, Short Form 12; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; SCHFI, Self-Care of Heart Failure Index; FAMQOL, Family Caregiver Quality of Life Scale; CBQ-HF, Caregiver Burden Questionnaire for Heart Failure; CC-SCHFI, Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index.

References

    1. Conrad N, Judge A, Tran J, et al. Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals. Lancet. 2018;391:572–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32520-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braunwald E. The war against heart failure: the Lancet lecture. Lancet. 2015;385:812–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61889-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3627–39. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Cardiac Audit Programme . National heart failure audit: 2019 summary report (2017/18 data) London: NICOR; 2019.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Chronic heart failure in adults: diagnosis and management. NICE Guideline [NG106] 2018. - PubMed

Publication types