Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 28;15(1):18759.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01681-0.

Optimizing copper phytoremediation and mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) yield through Sinorhizobium meliloti and Piriformospora indica inoculation

Affiliations

Optimizing copper phytoremediation and mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) yield through Sinorhizobium meliloti and Piriformospora indica inoculation

Zahra Amiriyan Chelan et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination in agricultural soil poses significant threats to ecosystem sustainability and human health. An outdoor box experiment was conducted as factorial abased on randomized complete block design, with three replications, during 2017 cropping season to evaluate the effects of biofertilizers on Vigna radiata L. growth and yield under different Cu concentrations. The first factor was fertilizer treatment including plant growth-promoting bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti (PGP), arbuscular mycorrhizal-like fungus Piriformospora indica (AM), and chemical fertilizer (CF) and the second factor was Cu concentrations consisted of 0, 50, 100, and 200 mg Cu/kg soil. The greatest plant height (30.20 and 30.17 cm) and leaf area index (LAI) (1.64 and 1.55) were observed at 0 and 50 mg Cu/kg soil, particularly in CF and AM treatments. The highest Cu concentrations were found in the shoots (74.42 mg/kg) and grains (75.92 mg/kg) when using CF at 200 mg Cu/kg soil. The highest Cu concentration in the roots was obtained in PGP biofertilizer treatment (160.7 mg Cu/kg root). In all Cu concentrations, the shoot bioconcentration factors (BCF) in CF and control treatments were higher than those in PGP and AM treatments. The root BCF improved with the use of PGP and AM treatments, compared to the control. Except the CF, the translocation factor (TF) in other treatments were ˂ 1 and the highest TF was obtained in 200 mg Cu/kg soil (0.842) and CF (1.050) treatment. Based on the results, we concluded that high Cu concentrations reduced the mung bean yield and productivity. However, applying AM in Cu-contaminated soil showed significant potential for improving mung bean yield, reducing Cu availability, and minimizing plant uptake. Generally, compared with chemical fertilizer (CF), P. indica and S. meliloti inoculation effectively increased Cu accumulation in the roots of mung bean grown in Cu-contaminated soil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mung bean grain yield per box as influenced by interaction of Cu concentration × fertilizer treatment (Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cu concentration in mung bean shoot as influenced by interaction of Cu concentration × fertilizer treatment (Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cu concentration in mung bean root as influenced by interaction of Cu concentration × fertilizer treatment (Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cu concentration in mung bean grain as influenced by interaction of Cu concentration × fertilizer treatment (Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Concentration of residual Cu in the soil as influenced by interaction of Cu concentration × fertilizer treatment (Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05.).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mung bean shoot BCF as influenced by interaction of Cu concentration × fertilizer treatment (Different letters indicate significant differences at p ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Mung bean root BCF as influenced by interaction of Cu concentration × fertilizer treatment (Different letters indicate significant difference at p ≤ 0.05).

Similar articles

References

    1. Kumar, S. & Pandey, G. Biofortification of pulses and legumes to enhance nutrition. Heliyon.6(3), 1–6. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03682 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li, C. et al. Integration of comparative transcriptomics and WGCNA characterizes the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Front. Plant Sci.14, 1251464. 10.3389/fpls.2023.1251464 (2023). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gong, X. et al. Boosting proso millet yield by altering canopy light distribution in proso millet/mung bean intercropping systems. Crop J.8(2), 365–377. 10.1016/j.cj.2019.09.009 (2020).
    1. Bai, Y. et al. Distribution of cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc in mudflat salt-soils amended with sewage sludge. Land Degrad. Dev.29(4), 1120–1129. 10.1002/ldr.2914 (2018).
    1. Golia, E. E. The impact of heavy metal contamination on soil quality and plant nutrition Sustainable management of moderate contaminated agricultural and urban soils, using low cost materials and promoting circular economy. Sustainable Chem. Pharm.33, 101046 (2023).

LinkOut - more resources