Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 28;15(1):18732.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03685-2.

Sulfonohydrazide as a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Affiliations

Sulfonohydrazide as a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Zoha Khan et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused immense mortality and morbidity reporting 704,753,890 cases worldwide. The repercussions of this pandemic are still being felt in the form of newly evolving variants and infections. The pandemic has pointed towards the need for the development of new and effective agents against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sulfonohydrazides are a class of compounds with a wide range of therapeutic potential. The present study aims to identify the anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential of Sulfonohydrazide compounds. Twenty-five Sulfonohydrazides derivatives were evaluated for anti-viral potential via plaque reduction assay (PRA) and cytopathic effect (CPE) analysis in-vitro. Treatment point assay was employed for the strategic evaluation of antiviral compound at the particular stages of the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle. Gene expression analysis was also carried out, which was supported by immunofluorescence assays targeting the N and S proteins of SARS-CoV-2, alongside fold-change analysis, to identify a robust and multifaceted approach for the understanding of viral dynamics. Moreover, ligand-inhibitor interactions were assessed by in- silico studies. Compound 24 (4(E)-4-methyl-N'-(2,3,4-trihydroxybenzylidene)benzenesulfonohydrazide) was identified as the most potent molecule that inhibited SARS-CoV-2 infection (92.85 ± 3.57%) via PRA. The time point assay revealed that the effect of the compound might be at the entry point, which might be due to the down-regulation of the Spike (S) and Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) genes by the compound. The gene expression analysis of ORF1a/b by qRT-PCR indicated reduction in viral load after compound treatment, as indicated by a higher cycle threshold (Ct) value. Moreover, the compound 24 also downregulated the expression of S, RdRp, and ACE-2. Furthermore, the interaction of compound 24 with S, RdRp, and ACE-2 was predicted via molecular docking, which validated the interaction and possible anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect. Additionally, immunofluorescence staining analysis of spike and nucleocapsid proteins also showed downregulation in SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. Overall, the acquired data suggested that Sulfonohydrazide derivative 24 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 entry and replication.

Keywords: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; Antivirals; Multi-target therapeutics; RNA dependent RNA polymerase; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Spike; Sulfonohydrazides.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The research study was ethically approved by the Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and & Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi (Reference # ICCBS/IEC-066-HNS/PC2021/Protocol/2.0). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Consent to participate: Informed consent for taking the nasal swab have been obtained from participant in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The cytotoxicity profile and anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential of compound 24 and Remdesivir (RDV). (A) Represents the IC50 of compound 24 and RDV with the R2 0.998 and 0.996, respectively; while (B) represents the CC50 of compound 24 and RDV with the R2 0.895 and 0.906, respectively. The data is represented as mean ± SD.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Compound 24 efficiently reduced SARS-CoV-2-induced plaque formation. (A) A marked decrease in the PFU/mL was observed after treatment with compound 24 as compared to the Remdesivir at the concentration of 83 µM. (B) Representative images of Vero cells 5 dpi with SARS-CoV-2. Infected cells treated with compound 24 and RDV showed a lesser number of plaques than non-treated infected cells. The data is represented as mean ± SD.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect of compound 24 at different viral time points in compound-treated SARS-CoV-2 infected Vero cells. Log fold-change was calculated compared to virus-treated cells before (prophylactic), during (entry), and after (therapeutic) compound treatments at 83 µM concentration, and the mean fold-change was plotted. The asterisk indicates the significance between different groups. One-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test was performed as a statistical analysis (p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Change in gene expression of (A) Nucleocapsid protein; (B) Spike protein; (C) ACE-2 receptor; (D) RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; (E) GAPDH; and (F) ORF1a/b, after compound 24 and drug treatments.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The effect of compound 24 on the expression of SARS-CoV-2 S- and N-proteins. Representative immunofluorescence microscopic images of (A) Spike, and (B) Nucleocapsid proteins. Histograms of fluorescence intensity of (C) Spike, and (D) Nucleocapsid protein expressions using ImageJ software. RDV = Remdesivir, Blue fluorescence indicates the nucleus, and green fluorescence illustrates S or N protein.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Representative 3D images of ligand-protein profile. (A) ACE, (B) Nucleocapsid N-terminal (C) Nucleocapsid C-terminal, (D) RdRp, and (E) Spike proteins.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lamers, M. M. & Haagmans, B. L. SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.20 (5), 270–284 (2022). - PubMed
    1. WHO. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (2020).
    1. Sanjuán, R. & Domingo-Calap, P. Mechanisms of viral mutation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.73, 4433–4448 (2016). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cascella, M. et al. Features, evaluation, and treatment of coronavirus (COVID-19) [Updated 2023 Aug 18]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; Jan (2024). - PubMed
    1. Flerlage, T., Boyd, D. F., Meliopoulos, V., Thomas, P. G. & Schultz-Cherry, S. Influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2: pathogenesis and host responses in the respiratory tract. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.19 (7), 425–441 (2021). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources