Open defecation free status and its determinants in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional survey
- PMID: 40437400
- PMCID: PMC12117848
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-23208-y
Open defecation free status and its determinants in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Introduction: Globally, the progress to attain the open defecation free (ODF) environment has remained very slow. This study examined context specific factors influencing household open defecation free status in Uganda.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Kabale district in southwestern Uganda and 492 participants were randomly selected at household level. Data was obtained through conducting a face-to-face interview using the mobile data collection software KoBoCollect v2021.3.4 installed on tablet devices. Using the Firth's penalized logistic regression, bivariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to determine if there existed significant associations between the outcome Household Open Defecation (HODF) status and independent variables. Variables with P < 0.2 at bivariate analysis comprised the global model for the multivariate analysis.
Results: The average age of the participants was 49 (SD 23.4) years. Most (67.68%) of the study participants, were females while 144 (29.27%) of the participants had no formal education. The households that were open defecation free were as few as 15 (3%). At multivariable analysis, gender of the participants, remembering handwashing, latrine and household cleanliness factors were significantly association with HODF status. Male participants had more odds of having open defecation free households (aOR: 3.89; 95% CI: 1.26-12.06) compared to female participants. Households with clean compounds, with latrines not having their holes soiled with feces and where respondents always remembered to wash hands after visiting latrine had high odds of being open defecation free (aOR: 3.15; 95% CI: 1.03-9.66, aOR: 10.56; 95% CI: 1.87-59.63 and aOR: 3.96; 95% CI: 1.24-12.68, respectively).
Conclusion: The prevalence of HODF was very low and factors associated with it were; the gender of the participants, the latrine and household cleanliness and the behavioral factor of remembering handwashing. We propose behavioral change interventions that empower communities to adapt improved sanitation behavior, such as Community Led Total Sanitation and Hygiene (CLTSH) in order to increase households with the Open Defecation Free status.
Keywords: CLTSH; Determinants; Household open defecation free (HODF) status; Open defecation (OD).
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Human ethics and consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all household heads or their spouses that participated in the study. The study protocol was approved by the High Degrees Research and Ethics Committee of School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University. The final approval and registration was done by the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (UNCST). The research registration number of UNCST is HS1135ES. The Helsinki declaration ethical considerations were observed in conducting this study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of community led total sanitation and hygiene approach on improvement of latrine utilization in Laelay Maichew District, North Ethiopia. A comparative cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203458. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30192803 Free PMC article.
-
Having a latrine facility is not a guarantee for eliminating open defecation owing to socio-demographic and environmental factors: The case of Machakel district in Ethiopia.PLoS One. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257813. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34591873 Free PMC article.
-
Open defecation practice among households with latrines in rural communities of Ararso District, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia.Front Public Health. 2024 May 1;12:1394351. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1394351. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38751595 Free PMC article.
-
Review of the slippage factors from open defecation-free (ODF) status towards open defecation (OD) after the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach implementation.Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 May;250:114160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114160. Epub 2023 Mar 21. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023. PMID: 36958189 Review.
-
Interventions to improve disposal of child faeces for preventing diarrhoea and soil-transmitted helminth infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):CD011055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011055.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31549742 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Organization WH. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2020: five years into the SDGs. 2021.
-
- Adhikari R, Ghimire S. Open defecation free: where do we need to focus? Health prospect. J Public Health. 2020;19(1):1–6.
-
- Coffey D, Gupta A, Hathi P, Khurana N, Spears D, Srivastav N, et al. Revealed preference for open defecation. Economic Political Wkly. 2014;49(38):43.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical