Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025;19(3-4):763-780.
doi: 10.1007/s11740-025-01338-x. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

Methodology for the knowledge-based selection of occupational exoskeletons

Affiliations

Methodology for the knowledge-based selection of occupational exoskeletons

Tobias Drees et al. Prod Eng. 2025.

Abstract

Occupational exoskeletons for industrial workplaces hold significant promise for improving worker ergonomics and safety. However, the successful selection of an exoskeleton depends on informed decision-making processes that consider various factors ranging from biomechanical performance to usability and compatibility with work tasks. This paper presents a methodology that aims to develop a co-simulation-based selection tool for selecting an exoskeleton for specific industrial work tasks. It integrates multidisciplinary knowledge from biomechanics, human factors engineering, and industrial ergonomics for assessing the suitability of exoskeletons across diverse industrial applications. The methodology is designed as a stage-gate process with five main stages corresponding to the product development process. It describes the main tasks in each phase, their results, and the gates between the stages. The tasks and results are derived and detailed from the current literature and preliminary work. The gates include the specification of the simulation and decision-relevant input and output parameters, the design of the co-simulation model consisting of task and biomechanical simulation, the weighting of the individual decision criteria, and the subsequent implementation of the multi-criteria decision analysis to create a ranking of suitable exoskeletons. This work concludes by elaborating on the impact of the novel co-simulation methodology on research and industry. Research implications include advanced simulation methods for exoskeleton evaluation, the systematic comparison of different exoskeletons, and the development of decision analysis models. Benefits to the industry include improved compatibility, informed selection processes, reduced investment risks, and increased technology adoption.

Keywords: Co-simulation model; Human–robot-collaboration; Knowledge-based selection; Methodology design; Multicriterial evaluation; Occupational exoskeletons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no Conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the desired link between the different simulations and input factors
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall concept of simulation-based OE selection
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proposed stage-gate process
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Tasks and results of stage Analysis and specification of characteristics
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Tasks and results of stage Conception of the basic evaluation systematic
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Different data level for movement data
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Tasks and results of stage Co-Simulation model design
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Tasks and results of stage Decision layer design
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Tasks and results of stage Decision layer design

References

    1. Looze MP, Bosch T, Krause F, Stadler KS, O’Sullivan LW (2016) Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load. Ergonomics 59(5):671–681. 10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988 - PubMed
    1. Weidner R, Karafillidis A (2018) Distinguishing support technologies: a general scheme and its application to exoskeletons. In: Karafillidis A, Weidner R (eds) Developing support technologies: biosystems & biorobotics, vol 23. Springer, Cham, pp 85–100. 10.1007/978-3-030-01836-8_8
    1. Kines P, Spangenberg S, Dyreborg J (2007) Prioritizing occupational injury prevention in the construction industry: injury severity or absence? J Saf Res 38(1):53–58. 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.09.002 - PubMed
    1. Crea S, Beckerle P, Looze M, Pauw K, Grazi L, Kermavnar T, Masood J, O’Sullivan LW, Pacifico I, Rodriguez-Guerrero C, Vitiello N, Ristić-Durrant D, Veneman J (2021) Occupational exoskeletons: a roadmap toward large-scale adoption—methodology and challenges of bringing exoskeletons to workplaces. Wearable Technol 2:11. 10.1017/wtc.2021.11 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drees T, Luttmer J, Nagarajah A (2023) A framework for the systematic selection of occupational exoskeletons. Procedia CIRP 119:1134–1139. 10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.185

LinkOut - more resources