Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep;58(5):638-645.
doi: 10.5946/ce.2025.022. Epub 2025 May 27.

Clinical significance of computer-aided quality assessment systems in colonoscopy: a comprehensive review

Affiliations
Review

Clinical significance of computer-aided quality assessment systems in colonoscopy: a comprehensive review

Wai Phyo Lwin et al. Clin Endosc. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Colonoscopy is the primary tool for colorectal cancer screening. High-quality colonoscopy is crucial for the detection of precancerous adenomas; however, the adenoma detection rate varies depending on the skill and experience of the endoscopist. Computer-aided quality assessment (CAQ) uses artificial intelligence (AI) technology to evaluate the quality of colonoscopy examinations. It plays an important role in reducing variations in examination quality and obtaining high-quality colonoscopic images. In this review, we focus specifically on the speedometer, effective withdrawal time, fold examination quality, bowel preparation quality assessment, and cecal intubation with CAQ systems and discuss the role and effectiveness of these systems. CAQ systems are expected to contribute to increase in adenoma detection rates, improvement in endoscopist skills, and standardization of examination quality. However, challenges such as variability in AI performance across different clinical settings and potential overreliance on automated prompts remain key limitations.

Keywords: Adenoma; Artificial intelligence; Colonic polyps; Colonoscopy; Computer-assisted diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

Katsuro Ichimasa, Shin-Ei Kudo, Taishi Okumura, Yasuharu Maeda, and Masashi Misawa received speaking honoraria from Olympus Corporation. Shin-Ei Kudo and Masashi Misawa have ownership interest in the products of Cybernet Systems. The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The domains and performance measures for assessing colonoscopy quality chosen by the working group. N/A, not available. Adapted from Kaminski et al. Endoscopy 2017;49:378–397, with permission.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:145–164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Anderson JC, Butterly LF, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;100:352–381. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.2905. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–1306. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1309086. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2017;49:378–397. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-103411. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Misawa M, Kudo SE. Current status of artificial intelligence use in colonoscopy. Digestion. 2025;106:138–145. doi: 10.1159/000543345. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources