Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 29;40(1):249.
doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04475-y.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety for the energy delivery and skin tightness of monopolar radiofrequency device in Asian

Affiliations

Evaluation of efficacy and safety for the energy delivery and skin tightness of monopolar radiofrequency device in Asian

Mi Soo Choi et al. Lasers Med Sci. .

Abstract

Monopolar radiofrequency(MRF) treatment is known to induce collagen contraction and remodeling in dermis. This study was conducted to evaluate safety of MRF in pre-clinical study first, and efficacy and safety in lifting and tightening of the face and upper neck in the clinical study. In pre-clinical setting, thermal imaging, and clinical and dermoscopic photography of after the procedure, and 7, 14, 30 days later were recorded. In clinical study, 23 subjects were enrolled and got 1 treatment. They were followed up at 4, 12, 24 weeks, and assessed using clinical photography. Changes in elasticity, pore number, wrinkle(%), and safety evaluation were also done. In the pre-clinical study, energy was safely delivered to the treatment area. In the clinical study, the clinical grades significantly decreased after 4, 12, and 24 weeks. Net and biological elasticity showed a significant increase at week 24. Pore count significantly decreased from week 12 and wrinkle started to decrease from week 4. Subjective satisfaction peaked in week 12. The average of pain score was 0.30 ± 0.63, and only mild adverse events were recorded. This study found that MRF deliver stable energy to the skin and have significant effect in skin laxity without complications.

Keywords: Aging; Asians; Facial laxity; Monopolar radiofrequency; Radiofrequency; Skin tightening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected in its approval by the institutional review board (IRB No. DKUH 2016-09-005-001). Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest to declare. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Similar articles

References

    1. Suh DH, Ahn HJ, Seo JK, Lee SJ, Shin MK, Song KY (2020) Monopolar radiofrequency treatment for facial laxity: histometric analysis. J Cosmet Dermatol 19(9):2317–2324. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13449 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan MG, Kwan KR, Park L, Tolkachjov SN (2024) Radiofrequency for face and body contouring. Adv Cosmet Surg 7(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yacs.2023.12.008 - DOI
    1. Ogden S, Griffiths TW (2008) A review of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Br J Dermatol 159(5):1036–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08845.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Domyati M, Ammawi TS, Medhat W, Moawad O, Brennan D, Mahoney MG et al (2011) Radiofrequency facial rejuvenation: evidence-based effect. J Am Acad Dermatol 64(3):524–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.06.045
    1. Kang SW, Amagai M, Bruckner AL, Enk AH, Margolis DJ, McMichael AJ et al (2018) Fitzpatrick’s dermatology 9th edition. Mc Graw Hill Education, New York, pp 3857–3870

LinkOut - more resources