Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 28:bmjqs-2024-018214.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018214. Online ahead of print.

What do people do in the aftermath of healthcare-related harm? A qualitative study on experiences and factors influencing decision-making

Affiliations
Free article

What do people do in the aftermath of healthcare-related harm? A qualitative study on experiences and factors influencing decision-making

Lavanya Thana et al. BMJ Qual Saf. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To capture experiences of people self-reporting harm and contrast responses and actions between those who do or do not take formal action.

Design: Semi-structured qualitative interview study.

Setting: People self-reporting harm experienced in the National Health Service (NHS) or their family/friends identified from a general Great British population survey.

Participants: 49 participants.

Results: There were commonalities in experiences after harm whether formal action (including making a formal complaint or litigation) was taken or not. Many participants reported raising concerns informally with NHS staff, trying to access explanations or support, but were usually unsuccessful. Decision-making on action was complex. There were multiple reasons for not pursuing formal action, including fears of damaging relationships with clinicians, being occupied coping with the consequences of the harm or not wanting to take action against the NHS. NHS advocacy services were not regarded as helpful. Knowledge of how to proceed and feeling entitled to do so, along with proactive social networks, could facilitate action, but often only after people were spurred on by anger and frustration about not receiving an explanation, apology or support for recovery from the NHS. Those from marginalised groups were more likely to feel disempowered to act or be discouraged by family or social contacts, which could lead to self-distancing and reduced trust in services.

Conclusions: People actively seek resolution and recovery after harm but often face multiple barriers in having their needs for explanations, apologies and support addressed. Open and compassionate engagement, especially with those from more marginalised communities, plus tailored support to address needs, could promote recovery, decrease compounded harm and reduce use of grievance services where other provision may be more helpful.

Keywords: Decision making; Health services research; Patient Safety; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: CV has received consulting fees by RSM UK Healthcare and honoraria from the Karolinska Institute and other universities.

LinkOut - more resources