Clinical assessment of cannula performance during adult minimally invasive valve surgery using predictive mathematical models
- PMID: 40442945
- PMCID: PMC12202995
- DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf127
Clinical assessment of cannula performance during adult minimally invasive valve surgery using predictive mathematical models
Abstract
Objectives: Peripheral cannula selection in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is crucial, as venous drainage limitations during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can impair end-organ perfusion and overall outcomes. This study evaluates the in vivo venous drainage efficiency of different peripheral venous cannulas for adult MICS by applying dynamic similarity (DS) prediction formulas.
Methods: This observational study included 75 adult MICS patients with use of single peripheral venous cannulation from January 2017 to June 2023. The analysis included cannulas Bio-Medicus Multi XL Life Support, Nextgen Bicaval and Smart cannulas. Cannula performance was assessed by comparing predicted pressures with in vivo measurements.
Results: A total of 278, 314 and 264 measurements were recorded for the Multi, Next and Smart cannulas, respectively. No significant demographic differences were found between groups. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients for agreement between predicted and measured pressures were >0.95 for the Multi and Next cannulas but substantially lower for the Smart cannula (0.80). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -1.09 mmHg for the Multi, -0.15 mmHg for the Next and 3.68 mmHg for the Smart cannula, with the latter exceeding the ±12.5 mmHg limits of agreement.
Conclusions: DS-based predictions revealed significant performance variability among peripheral venous cannula types. The in vivo performance was adequately predicted for the Multi and Next cannulas but not for the Smart cannula, underscoring the need for real-life evaluations and performance monitoring during CPB. Incorporating dynamic performance assessments into clinical decision-making might optimize venous drainage and patient outcomes.
Keywords: ECMO; cannula performance; cardiopulmonary bypass; dynamic similarity; minimally invasive cardiac surgery; venous drainage.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Pulmonary artery perfusion versus no pulmonary per-fusion during cardiopulmonary bypass.Dan Med J. 2018 Mar;65(3):B5473. Dan Med J. 2018. PMID: 29510817
-
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12:CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub3. PMID: 28394022 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Pulmonary artery perfusion versus no perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass for open heart surgery in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 8;2(2):CD011098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011098.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29419895 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701099
-
Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):CD013434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013434.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36507736 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vandewiele K, De Somer F, Vandenheuvel M, Philipsen T, Bove T. The impact of cardiopulmonary bypass management on outcome: a propensity matched comparison between minimally invasive and conventional valve surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020;31:48–55. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa052 - DOI - PubMed
-
- De Somer F. Strategies for Optimisation of Paediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands: Shaker Publications, 2003.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical