Endoscopic Options for Complications after Pancreatic Surgery
- PMID: 40443409
- PMCID: PMC12119102
- DOI: 10.1159/000545766
Endoscopic Options for Complications after Pancreatic Surgery
Abstract
Background: The shift in surgery is taking place in two directions. On the one hand, it is shifting from open surgery to minimally invasive surgery which will ultimately morph into robot-assisted surgery. On the other hand, the therapeutic possibilities of flexible endoscopy have developed enormously in recent years. Various procedures, such as the debridement of pancreatic necrosis, the resection of early neoplasms, the treatment of achalasia, or the resection of numerous submucosal tumors, have passed into the hands of the interventional endoscopist. Endoscopic procedures have also become established in the management of complications of major intestinal procedures. Despite the fact that endoscopic therapy requires time to heal, for example, in VAC therapy, it being less invasive reduces patient morbidity.
Summary: The most common complications in modern pancreatic surgery are pancreatogenic fistulas and fluid collections, as well as insufficiencies of pancreatointestinal or biliodigestive anastomoses. Such complications can be treated endoscopically using methods such as stent placement in the pancreatic or bile duct, endosonographically guided drainage of fluid collections, and even VAC therapy.
Key messages: Endoscopic intervention is the first procedure of choice offered in the treatment of complications in pancreatic surgery. It primarily reduces morbidity in the recovery phase of patients.
Keywords: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Endoscopic therapy; Pancreatic surgery; Postsurgical complications; Surgical endoscopy.
© 2025 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
Jörn Bernhardt is a consultant by MicroTech GmbH. The other authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures





Similar articles
-
American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis.Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):67-75.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.064. Epub 2019 Aug 31. Gastroenterology. 2020. PMID: 31479658 Review.
-
The society for gastrointestinal intervention. Are we, as an organization of disparate disciplines, cooperative or competitive?Gut Liver. 2010 Sep;4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-8. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2010.4.S1.S1. Epub 2010 Sep 10. Gut Liver. 2010. PMID: 21103287 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Therapy With Lumen-apposing Metal Stents Is Safe and Effective for Patients With Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Dec;14(12):1797-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 14. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27189914
-
Surgical management of failed endoscopic treatment of pancreatic disease.J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Nov;12(11):1924-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0644-2. Epub 2008 Aug 15. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008. PMID: 18709421
-
Management of Inflammatory Fluid Collections and Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis.Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec;15(4):576-586. doi: 10.1007/s11938-017-0161-z. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 29103188 Review.
References
-
- van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, et al. . A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(16):1491–502. - PubMed
-
- van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Boermeester MA, et al. . Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10115):51–8. - PubMed
-
- Giuliano K, Ejaz A, He J. Technical aspects of pancreaticoduodenectomy and their outcomes. Chin Clin Oncol. 2017;6(6):64. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources