Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;39(6):e70199.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.70199.

Postkidney Transplant Delayed Graft Function Outcomes Are Not Worsened by Deceased Donor Type

Affiliations

Postkidney Transplant Delayed Graft Function Outcomes Are Not Worsened by Deceased Donor Type

Angela L Zhou et al. Clin Transplant. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Kidney-delayed graft function (DGF) is more common in donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors in comparison to donatation after brain death (DBD). We analyzed deceased kidney transplant recipients (DDKTR) at our center between 2005 and 2019, stratified by donor type (DBD vs. DCD).

Methods: We assessed risk factors for DGF, acute rejection (AR), graft failure (GF), along with the death with functioning graft (DWFG), and the interaction between types of donors for those complications.

Results: Among 2543 DDKTRs, 804 (32%) were from DCD donors. Older donor age, higher recipient body mass index, and receipt of a depleting induction agent were associated with increased risk for DGF in both DBD and DCD. In contrast, preemptive transplant and female recipient gender were associated with reduced risk. Additional risk factors in DBD, but not in DCD recipients, included higher donor terminal serum creatinine, higher kidney donor profile index, right donor kidney, and prolonged cold ischemia time. Female donors were associated with a reduced risk of DGF only among DCD donors. DGF was associated with higher AR and GF, with no significant differences across donor types, DBD vs. DCD (AR: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.22 vs. 2.37, p-interaction = 0.65; GF: 3.04 vs. 2.56; p-interaction = 0.47). DGF was associated with a higher risk for DWFG among DBD (aHR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.96-6.00, p < 0.001) but not with DCD (aHR: 1.90, 95% CI: 0.78-4.61, p = 0.16), with p-interaction of 0.15 CONCLUSION: Despite higher DGF rates in DCD, early adverse outcomes after DGF were similar between deceased donor types and should not deter the utilization of DCD kidneys.

Keywords: DGF; deceased donor; kidney transplant; outcomes; risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Outcomes comparing types of deceased donors with and without delayed graft function.

Similar articles

References

    1. Yarlagadda S. G., Coca S. G., Formica R. N., Jr P. E. D., and Parikh C. R., “Association Between Delayed Graft Function and Allograft and Patient Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 24, no. 3 (2008): 1039–1047. - PubMed
    1. Siedlecki A., Irish W., and Brennan D. C., “Delayed Graft Function in the Kidney Transplant,” American Journal of Transplantation 11, no. 11 (2011): 2279–2296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Helanterä I., Ibrahim H. N., Lempinen M., and Finne P., “Donor Age, Cold Ischemia Time, and Delayed Graft Function,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 15, no. 6 (2020): 813–821. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ojo A. O., Wolfe R. A., Held P. J., Port F. K., and Schmouder R. L., “Delayed Graft Function: Risk Factors and Implications for Renal Allograft Survival,” Transplantation 63, no. 7 (1997): 968–974. - PubMed
    1. Tapiawala S. N., Tinckam K. J., Cardella C. J., et al., “Delayed Graft Function and the Risk for Death With a Functioning Graft,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 21, no. 1 (2010): 153–161. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms