Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec;20(1):2512943.
doi: 10.1080/15592324.2025.2512943. Epub 2025 May 30.

TiO2 nanomaterial promotes plant growth and disease resistance

Affiliations

TiO2 nanomaterial promotes plant growth and disease resistance

Xiaotong Gai et al. Plant Signal Behav. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

TiO2 nanomaterials can promote plant growth and enhance disease resistance. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. This study applied TiO2 to promote the growth of wheat, soybean, tobacco, cucumber, and corn. Genetic analysis using macro-element transporter rice mutants in rice revealed that growth promotion induced by TiO2 was dependent on potassium transporter (AKT1), nitrate transporter 1.1B (NRT1.1B), ammonium transporter 1 (AMT1), and phosphate transporter 8 (PT8). TiO2 also enhanced chlorophyll accumulation, and growth promotion was inhibited in the chlorophyll biosynthesis rice mutants, yellow-green leaf 8 (ygl8) and divinyl reductase (dvr), indicating that TiO2 promoted growth through chlorophyll biosynthesis. In addition to photosynthesis, TiO2 affected light signaling by inhibiting the translocation of Phytochrome B (PhyB) from the cytosol to the nucleus, thereby improving resistance to rice sheath blight (ShB). TiO2 application also enhanced resistance to wheat stem rust, tobacco wildfire, angular spot disease, and rice ShB by inhibiting the growth of bacterial and fungal pathogens, suggesting that TiO2 regulates plant defense signaling and has antibacterial and antifungal effects. Field experiments with wheat, soybeans, and rice confirmed that TiO2 treatment significantly increased the crop yield. These findings suggest that TiO2 is a promising nanomaterial for the simultaneous enhancement of plant growth and disease resistance.

Keywords: TiO2; disease resistance; nutrient uptake; plant growth promoting; yield increase.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Growth-promoting effect of TiO2 on crops. (a) Rice seedlings were grown in liquid MS solution containing 72, 36, 18, and 9 ppb TiO2 for 7 d, respectively. (b) Shoot and (c) root lengths of the rice shown in (a). (d) TiO2 (9 ppb) was sprayed on the wheat to treat them. Seven-day-old wheat was photographed, and (e) the height of the wheat shown in (d) was calculated. (f) TiO2 (9 ppb) was sprayed on the corn. Seven-day-old corn was photographed, and (g) the height of the corn shown in (f) was calculated. (h) TiO2 (9 ppb) was sprayed on the soybean. Seven-day-old soybeans were photographed, and (i) the height of the soybeans shown in (g) and the relative leaf area (J) shown in (H) were calculated. (k) TiO2 (9 ppb) was sprayed on the tobacco. Fourteen-day-old tobacco plants were photographed and (l) the height of the tobacco shown in (k) was calculated. (m) TiO2 (9 ppb) was sprayed on the cucumber. Seven-day-old cucumbers were photographed, and (n) the height of the cucumbers shown in (M) was calculated. Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE) (n > 10). Significant differences are denoted by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). ns: no significant difference. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The promotion of rice growth by TiO2 is related to the absorption of nutrient elements. (a) ZH11 and nrt1.1b grown for 7 d in the liquid MS solution with or without 9 ppb TiO2 were photographed. (b) The growth-promotion rate of the rice shoots shown in (a) was calculated. (c) The growth-promotion rate of the roots in (a). (d) Morphology of Nip and pt8 in MS nutrient solution containing 9 ppb TiO2 or without TiO2 for 7 d. (e) The growth-promotion rate of the shoots in (d). (f) The growth-promotion rate of the roots in (d). (g) Morphology of DJ, AMT1 RNAi, and akt1 in MS nutrient solution containing 9 ppb TiO2 or without TiO2 for 7 d. (h) The growth-promotion rate of the shoots in (g). (i) The growth-promotion rate of the roots in (g). Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE) (n > 10). Significant differences are denoted by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). ns: no significant difference. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
TiO2 improves disease resistance in plants. Plants were treated with 9 ppb TiO2 before inoculation. (a) Morphology of wheat leaves after inoculation with Pgt. (b) Lesion area of wheat shown in (a) was calculated. (c) Morphology of rice leaves after inoculation with R. solani AG1-IA. (d) Lesion length of the rice shown in (c) was calculated. (e) Morphology of tobacco leaves inoculated with Pst W11. (f) Relative lesion area of the tobacco shown in (e) was calculated. (g) Morphology of tobacco leaves after inoculation with Psa 1-J. (H) Relative lesion area of tobacco shown in (g) was calculated. (i) Morphology of tobacco leaves after inoculation with Pst ZD. (j) Relative lesion area of the tobacco shown in (i) was calculated. (k) Morphology of tobacco leaves inoculated with Pst D151. (l) Relative lesion area of tobacco shown in (k) was calculated. Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE) (n > 8). Significant differences are denoted by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). ns: no significant difference. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Antifungal activity of TiO2. (a) Cultures of different fungi grown on PDA plates treated with 9 ppb of TiO2. (b) Colony diameter of Fusarium verticillioides (a), (c) Exserohilum turcicum, (d) Botryosphaeria dothidea, (e) Sclerotium rolfsii, (f) R. solani AG1-IA, (G) Alternaria alternata shown in (a) were calculated. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Antifungal and antibacterial activities of TiO2. (a) The OD600 growth rate of Pst ZD, (b) Pst D151, (c) Pst W11, (d) Psa 1-J, (e) PXO99A, and (f) Ustilago maydis was calculated after being inoculated with 72, 36, 18, and 9 ppb TiO2 for 12 h. (g) The OD600 growth rate of Pst ZD, (h) Pst D151, (i) Pst W11, (j) Psa 1-J, (k) PXO99A, and (l) Ustilago maydis was calculated after being inoculated with 72, 36, 18, and 9 ppb TiO2 for 24 h. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
TiO2 improves the chlorophyll content of rice and inhibits PhyB translocation from the cytosol to the nucleus. (a) Chlorophyll content was measured after 14 d of 9 ppb TiO2 treatment. Fig. 6 TiO2 improves the chlorophyll content of rice and inhibits PhyB translocation from the cytosol to the nucleus. (a) Chlorophyll content was measured after 14 d of treatment with 9 ppb TiO2. (b) Total chlorophyll content of rice grown in MS liquid medium containing 9 ppb TiO2 for 14 d. (c) Seven-day-old SH498, dvr, and ygl8 seedlings were grown in MS solution with or without 9 ppb TiO2. (d) Growth-promotion rate of shoots in (c). (e) Growth-promotion rate of roots in (c). (f) Seven-day-old germinated DJ and gs1;1 seedlings were transferred to MS nutrient solution with or without 9 ppb TiO2. (g) Growth-promotion rate of shoots in (f). (h) Growth-promotion rate of roots in (f). (i) Distribution of PhyB protein in rice PhyB-OX treated with 9 ppb TiO2 for 7 d. (j) Total protein content. (k) Grayscale value of (l). Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE) (n > 8). Significant differences are denoted by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). ns: no significant difference.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
TiO2 increases rice, soybean, and wheat yields. (a)–(d) Field-grown wheat, soybean, and rice following TiO2 treatment were photographed. (e) Height of wheat, (f) spike length, (g) weight per spike, (h) number per spike, and (i) thousand-grain weight of wheat after TiO2 treatment. (j) Height of soybean, (k) yield per soybean plant, (l) number of pods per soybean, (m) total number of seeds per soybean, and (n) hundred grain weight of soybean after TiO2 treatment. (o) Tiller number, (p) number of filled grains per panicle, (q) thousand-grain weight number of filled grains per panicle, and (R) yield per plant of rice after TiO2 treatment. Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Significant differences are denoted by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). ns: no significant difference.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Working model of TiO2 in promoting plant growth and resistance: TiO2 inhibits the nuclear import of PhyB and promotes the resistance of rice to ShB. TiO2 mediates the activation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium absorption as well as photosynthesis to enhance plant growth. TiO2 promotes the growth of wheat, corn, tobacco, soybeans and cucumbers at the seedling stage. TiO2 directly inhibits growth of pathogenic fungi and bacteria. Furthermore, TiO2 inhibits PhyB translocation from the cytosol to the nucleus, thereby enhancing the resistance of rice to ShB.

Similar articles

References

    1. Barhoum A, García-Betancourt ML, Jeevanandam J, Hussien EA, Mekkawy SA, Mostafa M, Omran MM, Abdalla M, Bechelany M.. Review on natural, incidental, bioinspired, and engineered nanomaterials: history, definitions, classifications, synthesis, properties, market, toxicities, risks, and regulations. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(2):177. doi:10.3390/nano12020177. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wahab A, Muhammad M, Ullah S, Abdi G, Shah GM, Zaman W, Ayaz A. Agriculture and environmental management through nanotechnology: eco-friendly nanomaterial synthesis for soil-plant systems, food safety, and sustainability. Sci Total Environ. 2024;926:171862. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171862. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Babu S, Singh R, Yadav D, Rathore SS, Raj R, Avasthe R, Yadav SK, Das A, Yadav V, Yadav B, et al. Nanofertilizers for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Chemosphere. 2022;292:133451. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133451. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chhipa H. Nanofertilizers and nanopesticides for agriculture. Environ Chem Lett. 2017;15(1):15–12. doi:10.1007/s10311-016-0600-4. - DOI
    1. Maity D, Gupta U, Saha S. Biosynthesized metal oxide nanoparticles for sustainable agriculture: next-generation nanotechnology for crop production, protection and management. Nanoscale [J]. 2022;14(38):13950–13989. doi:10.1039/D2NR03944C. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources