Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;23(2):e70130.
doi: 10.1002/msc.70130.

Accessible Patient Education Materials for Low Back Pain Rarely Meet People's Information Needs: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Accessible Patient Education Materials for Low Back Pain Rarely Meet People's Information Needs: A Scoping Review

Chloé Debonne et al. Musculoskeletal Care. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Patient education is a cornerstone of care for individuals with non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, little is known about whether accessible patient education materials (PEMs) meet people's information needs.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review following the JBI methodology and reported results according to PRISMA-ScR. We systematically reviewed three databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL. The search strategy was iteratively developed and peer-reviewed using the PRESS checklist. Eligible studies had to provide full access to the PEM designed for people with LBP. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently and in duplicate. Five reviewers conducted a consensus-based analysis by independently matching PEM content to eight categories of information needs derived from previous research.

Results: Of 9617 citations identified, 23 studies met inclusion criteria, yielding 41 unique PEMs. We excluded many citations (67.3%) because the PEM used in the study was missing. Most PEMs were in English (95%) and took the form of posters, booklets, or leaflets. Only eight PEMs (19.5%) reported readability assessment. Stakeholder involvement was reported in eight studies. Among PEMs with stakeholder input, characteristics from the PROGRESS + framework were rarely disclosed. Only one PEM addressed all eight identified information needs. The most frequently covered information needs were treatment options (65.9%) and imaging (61.0%), while information on prognosis and flare management was scarce (17.1%).

Conclusion: Accessible PEMs for non-specific LBP rarely meet the full spectrum of patient information needs. Improving stakeholder involvement and readability assessment is essential to enhance the usefulness and equity of educational resources.

Keywords: health equity; information needs; low back pain; patient education; stakeholder involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flowchart. PEM, patient education material.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adenis, N. , Gosselin K., Stetsenko N., and Thevenon A.. 2023. “Clarification of the ‘Pain Neuroscience Education’ Concept in the Management of Patients With Persistent Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 36, no. 5: 995–1010. 10.3233/bmr-220370. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agre, S. , and Agrawal R.. 2023. “‘At‐Job’ Exercise Program Versus Ergonomic Brochure on Pain and Disability in Preprimary School Teachers With Low Back Pain.” Indian Journal of Physical Therapy and Research 5, no. 2: 176–181. https://journals.lww.com/ijpt/fulltext/2023/05020/_at_job__exercise_prog....
    1. Asamoah, G. D. , Khakpour M., Carr T., and Groot G.. 2023. “Exploring Indigenous Traditional Healing Programs in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand: A Scoping Review.” EXPLORE 19, no. 1: 14–25. 10.1016/j.explore.2022.06.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Askin, N. 2017. “Providing Access to Multilingual Patient Education Materials.” Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet 21, no. 3: 305–312. 10.1080/15398285.2017.1353289. - DOI
    1. Boutemen, L. , and Miller A. N.. 2023. “Readability of Publicly Available Mental Health Information: A Systematic Review.” Patient Educ Couns 111: 107682. 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107682. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types