Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 30;53(1):102.
doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01773-6.

Optimizing aspiration efficiency in RIRS: the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter, irrigation flow, and negative pressure in an vitro study

Tianfu Ding  1 , Zheng Xu  1 , Zhongyue Huang  1 , Weiguo Hu  1 , Bo Xiao  2 , Jianxing Li  3
Affiliations

Optimizing aspiration efficiency in RIRS: the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter, irrigation flow, and negative pressure in an vitro study

Tianfu Ding et al. Urolithiasis. .

Abstract

To examine the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD), irrigation rate, and negative pressure on the efficiency of stone fragment aspiration during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in an in vitro setting. Five grams of stone fragment were precisely measured and placed in renal calyx. A flexible ureteroscope with a Flexible Adjustable Navigation Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) was introduced into the renal calyx, connected to an irrigation pump and suction pump. A urologist performed 1-minute simulated intraoperative aspiration maneuvers. Residual stone dust was collected from the suction system, dried, and reweighed. Experimental variables included ureteroscope dimensions (7.5Fr and 8.6Fr), FANS sizes (10/12Fr and 12/14Fr), negative pressure levels (0.02 MPa and 0.01 MPa), and irrigation flow rates (100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 ml/min). Intrarenal pelvic pressure was monitored in real time with a digital pressure transducer probe in the renal pelvis. Experiments were conducted in the upper, middle, and lower calyces, with each parameter combination repeated five times in a randomized order to ensure statistical reliability.The study demonstrated that under low negative pressure (0.01 MPa), stone fragment aspiration efficiency exhibited a parabolic relationship with irrigation flow rate. Maximum efficiency was observed at 200 ml/min across all ureteroscope-FANS configurations. Elevating negative pressure to 0.02 MPa significantly enhanced aspiration efficiency, with peak performance maintained at 200 ml/min. The different positions of the renal calyces have a significant impact on the aspiration efficiency, and the aspiration efficiency of the lower calyx is significantly lower than that of the upper and middle calyces. Smaller FANS-to-endoscope ratios (e.g., 10/12Fr UAS with 7.5Fr f-URS, RESD = 0.75) demonstrated 27.2% lower aspiration efficiency compared to larger sheaths (12/14Fr FANS, RESD = 0.64) at 200 ml/min under 0.02 MPa (P < 0.001). All f-URS and FANS configurations maintained intrapelvic pressure (IPP) within safe thresholds across varying irrigation flow rates and negative pressure conditions.The efficiency and safety of stone fragment aspiration is high when the infusion rate is 200 ml/min and the negative pressure is 0.02Mpa. A smaller RESD leads to greater aspiration efficiency.

Keywords: Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths; Irrigation rate; Negative pressure; Stone free rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Hill AJ, Basourakos SP, Lewicki P, Wu X, Arenas-Gallo C, Chuang D, Bodner D, Jaeger I, Nevo A, Zell M, Markt SC, Eisner BH, Shoag JE (2022) Incidence of kidney stones in the united States: the continuous National health and nutrition examination survey. J Urol 207:851–856. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000002331 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hinojosa-Gonzalez DE, Saffati G, Kronstedt S, Rodriguez C, La T, Link RE, Mayer WA (2024) Endourological management of renal stones: A systematic review, bayesian network Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2024.12.030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vanlangendonck R, Landman J (2004) Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath. Urologic Clin North Am 31:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-0143(03)00095-8 - DOI
    1. Gauhar V, Traxer O, Castellani D, Ragoori D, Heng CT, Chew BH, Somani BK, Bin Hamri S (2023) A feasibility study on clinical utility, efficacy and limitations of 2 types of flexible and navigable Suction ureteral access sheaths in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones. Urology 178:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu W, Liu S, Cao J, Wang H, Liang H, Jiang K, Cui Y, Chai CA, Sahinler EB, Aquino A, Mazzon G, Zhong W, Zhao Z, Zhang L, Ding J, Wang Q, Wang Y, Chen KW, Liu Y, Choong S, Sarica K, Zeng G (2024) Tip bendable Suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study. EClinicalMedicine 74:102724doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102724 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources