Impact of analgesia modality on postoperative recovery after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
- PMID: 40445484
- DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02268-0
Impact of analgesia modality on postoperative recovery after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
Abstract
In the context of enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) for colorectal surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) delays recovery compared to opioid-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA). Limited evidence is available for laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of different analgesic modalities on the time to functional recovery (TFR) following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). Clinical data for consecutive patients undergoing LDP were reviewed. All patients were treated within an ERP including a multimodal analgesia protocol. The main analgesic techniques used were TEA, intravenous morphine PCA, and patient-controlled sublingual sufentanil tablet system (SSTS). TFR was defined as postoperative days (PODs) needed to achieve adequate mobilization, return of gastrointestinal function, sufficient oral intake with no need for intravenous infusion, and adequate pain control with oral analgesia. Overall, 336 patients were included; 109 (32%) patients received TEA, 124 (37%) PCA, and 103 (31%) SSTS. TFR was significantly shorter for the SSTS group with median of 4 [IQR 3-5] days compared to 5 [4-6] days in both the TEA and PCA groups (p < 0.001). This difference was due to faster time to sufficient oral intake and adequate pain control with oral analgesia. On POD1, patients treated with TEA had better pain control compared to other modalities; the median NRS pain score at rest was 0 [0-3] compared to 2 [0-4] for both PCA and SSTS groups (p = 0.003). Multivariate regression showed that SSTS was associated with a 17% reduction (95% CI - 29 to - 5; p = 0.005) of TFR compared to TEA. Patients treated with SSTS had a significantly shorter TFR after LDP compared with other analgesic modalities with no difference in adverse events.
Keywords: Analgesia; Distal pancreatectomy; Laparoscopy; Outcome and process assessment (health care); Pancreatic neoplasms; Postoperative recovery.
© 2025. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: Giovanni Guarneri, Stefano Turi, Nicolò Pecorelli, Giuseppe Culicchia, Alessia Vallorani, Renato Meani, Luigi Beretta, and Massimo Falconi have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to disclose.
References
-
- Lee L, Feldman LS (2017) Improving surgical value and culture through enhanced recovery programs. JAMA Surg 152:299–300. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMASURG.2016.5056 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Feldman LS, Delaney CP (2014) Laparoscopy plus enhanced recovery: optimizing the benefits of MIS through SAGES “SMART” program. Surg Endosc 28:1403–1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00464-013-3415-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M (2014) Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38:1531–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D, Grass F, Perinel J, Adham M, Wellge EB, Kunzler F, Besselink MG, Asbun H, Scott MJ, Dejong CHC, Vrochides D, Aloia T, Izbicki JR, Demartines N (2020) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreatoduodenectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations 2019. World J Surg 44(7):2056–2084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w . (PMID: 32161987) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Salicath JH, Yeoh EC, Bennett MH (2018) Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD010434. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
