Rituximab Use for Relapse Prevention in Anti-NMDAR Antibody-Mediated Encephalitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study
- PMID: 40446185
- PMCID: PMC12153942
- DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200395
Rituximab Use for Relapse Prevention in Anti-NMDAR Antibody-Mediated Encephalitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study
Abstract
Background and objectives: Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody used in patients with anti-NMDAR antibody (Ab)-mediated encephalitis as both an acute escalation therapy and a longer term relapse risk-reduction treatment. The potential long-term benefit of a single course administered during the acute disease phase on future relapse risk is uncertain. Moreover, the optimal dosing duration to reduce relapse risk is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a single course of rituximab on relapse incidence. We also studied the duration of effect of a course of rituximab in adult patients with anti-NMDAR Ab-mediated encephalitis.
Methods: We recruited 67 patients with anti-NMDAR Ab-mediated encephalitis from 10 Australian hospitals. Rituximab exposure was quantified as a time-varying covariate in Cox proportional hazard models.
Results: A single course of rituximab was associated with longer time to first relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.70, p = 0.02). For patients in whom redosing is considered, rituximab was associated with longer time to first relapse at 6 months after the last infusion, after adjusting for concurrent immunotherapies and the presence of ovarian teratoma at disease onset (HR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00-0.48, p = 0.005). The treatment effect did not persist out to 12 months after a given course (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.15-2.44, p = 0.47).
Discussion: A single course of rituximab reduces the risk of relapse of anti-NMDAR antibody-mediated encephalitis. In select patients for whom redosing of rituximab is considered, administration at 6 months delays relapses.
Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that rituximab delays relapses in patients with anti-NMDAR antibody-mediated encephalitis.
Conflict of interest statement
S. Blum is and has been involved in clinical trials sponsored by Roche, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, CSL, Clene Nanomedicine, Biogen, and Merck; and his institution has received honoraria for advisory boards and speaking honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Roche, and Novartis. H. Butzkueven is an employee of Monash University and has accepted travel compensation from Merck; his institution receives honoraria for talks, steering committee activities, and research grants from Roche, Merck, Biogen, Novartis, and UCB Pharma, Medical Research Future Fund Australia, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Australia, Trish MS Foundation, MS Australia, and the Pennycook Foundation; he also receives personal compensation for steering group activities for the Brain Health Initiative from Oxford Health Policy Forum, and is funded by an NHMRC Australia Investigator Grant. K. Buzzard is a principal investigator in clinical trials for Novartis, Merck, Roche, and Biogen; has received speaker honoraria and/or travel grants from Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, Alexion, Merck, Biogen, Novartis, and Teva; and has been on advisory boards for Merck, Biogen, and UCB. T. Hardy has received honoraria for talks, advisory boards, or support for scientific meetings from Bayer-Schering, Novartis, Biogen Idec, Merck, Teva, Merck, Alexion, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Sanofi-Genzyme; has been the principal investigator on phase IV trials in MS funded by Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme; is co-editor of
Figures


References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources