Incidence of cognitive errors in difficult airway management: an inference human factors study from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry
- PMID: 40447486
- PMCID: PMC12597392
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.033
Incidence of cognitive errors in difficult airway management: an inference human factors study from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry
Abstract
Background: Cognitive errors are known contributors to poor decision-making in healthcare. However, their incidence and extent of their contribution to negative outcomes during difficult airway management are unknown. We aimed to identify cognitive errors during paediatric difficult airway management using data from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry, to determine patient and clinician factors associated with these errors, and their contribution to complications.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the PeDI registry data including cases with at least three intubation attempts. Cognitive error definitions were adapted to airway management, and predefined clinical endpoints were used to identify cognitive errors. A subanalysis was performed for children weighing <5 kg. Our primary outcome was the overall incidence of cognitive errors. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of specific cognitive error subtypes, associations with patient and clinician factors, and the relationship between cognitive errors and complications.
Results: Cognitive errors were identified in 17.4% (487/2801) of cases, with fixation errors being the most common (11.5%), followed by omission bias (5.9%) and overconfidence bias (4.5%). Non-anaesthesiologist clinicians had the highest odds of cognitive errors. The presence of at least one cognitive error was independently associated with a higher risk of complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.27]; P<0.001), and multiple errors increased the likelihood of severe complications (adjusted odds ratio, 2.48 [95% confidence interval, 1.24-4.94]; P=0.01).
Conclusions: Cognitive errors occurred in nearly 20% of paediatric difficult airway encounters and were linked to increased complications. Further research should refine error definitions and develop mitigation strategies to improve outcomes.
Keywords: airway management; bias; cognitive error; difficult airway; human factors; human performance; medical error; paediatric difficult airway.
Copyright © 2025 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations of interest PGD is a member and Chair of the Quality and Safety Committee at Society for Pediatric Anesthesia (no payment involved). PK is in the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) commissioned and international Patient Safety Priority (PSP) Advisory Group on Airway Management (no payment involved). AH: Verathon Inc. and the American College of Osteopathic Anesthesiologists (consulting fees) and has an uncompensated leadership role in the Society for Pediatric Anesthesiologist Difficult Intubation SIG. ACL received a one-time honorarium for a chapter in Current Reviews in Clinical Anesthesia. BSvUS: NHMRC, Australia, Stan Perron Charitable Foundation, Perth, Australia (payments to institutions for independent research funds). JP received compensation for writing a chapter in Wolters Kluwer Health publisher of Barash, Cullen, and Stoelting's Clinical Anesthesia. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Velazquez J. The Presence of Behavioral Traps in U.S. Airline Accidents: A Qualitative Analysis. Safety. 2018;4(2)
-
- Perrow C. Princeton University Press; Princeton, New Jersey: 1999. Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies.
-
- Nadri C., Regalado J., Ferris T., Zahabi M. Cognitive biases in commercial aviation: empirical review of accident reports. Proc Hum Factor. Ergon Soc Ann Meet. 2024;68:56–60.
-
- Parker S.H. Human factors science: brief history and applications to healthcare. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2015;45:390–394. - PubMed
-
- Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in A . In: To Err is human: building a safer health system. Kohn L.T., Corrigan J.M., Donaldson M.S., editors. National Academies Press (US); Washington, DC: 2000. Why Do Errors Happen? pp. 49–65. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
