Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;33(9):1188-1193.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01871-4. Epub 2025 May 30.

The development and usability of 'The Genetics Navigator': a digital solution for adult and paediatric clinical genetics services

Collaborators, Affiliations

The development and usability of 'The Genetics Navigator': a digital solution for adult and paediatric clinical genetics services

Saumeh Saeedi et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Clinical genetic services address diverse genetic testing needs, but there is no comprehensive digital solution to meet this variety. We aimed to develop and test the usability of the Genetics Navigator (GN), a platform designed to enhance genetic services for paediatric and adult patients. The GN prototype was created with input from a patient and clinician advisory board, informed by prior research. Usability testing involved genetics patients (N = 14), parents of paediatric patients (N = 4), and the general public (N = 10). Participants provided feedback using the 'think aloud' method when using the platform. We used the System Usability Scale (SUS) for quantitative evaluation. Qualitative data were coded by platform section, item, and identified key areas for improvement. Building on the Genetics Adviser platform, we added video and written content for various genetic conditions and patient groups, including pre-test education, counselling, decision support, history collection, post-test result disclosure, and management. Key feedback during rounds of usability testing emphasized the need for a supportive design, seamless workflow, and engaging experience of the tool. The tool was modified to reflect the feedback, and the GN achieved an average SUS score of 87.7 ± 10.9 (N = 28), indicating above-average usability. Future research will evaluate its clinical and cost-effectiveness in a randomized trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: YB and MC are founders and shareholders of the Genetics Adviser. Ethics: The main study site was St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Ethics approval was obtained from the St. Michael’s Hospital Research Ethics Board. All participants provided written consent.

References

    1. Raspa M, Moultrie R, Toth D, Haque SN. Barriers and facilitators to genetic service delivery models: scoping review. Interact J Med Res. 2021;10:e23523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown EG, Watts I, Beales ER, Maudhoo A, Hayward J, Sheridan E, et al. Videoconferencing to deliver genetics services: a systematic review of telegenetics in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Genet Med. 2021;23:1438–49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shickh S, Rafferty SA, Clausen M, Kodida R, Mighton C, Panchal S, et al. The role of digital tools in the delivery of genomic medicine: enhancing patient-centered care. Genet Med. 2021;23:1086–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assamad DSS, Grewal S, Jha V, Luca S, Clausen M, Shaw A, et al. Patients’ views on how digital tools enable personalized and partnered care in genetics: a qualitative study. [Unpublished].
    1. Wang C, Bickmore T, Bowen DJ, Norkunas T, Campion M, Cabral H, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of a virtual counselor (VICKY) to collect family health histories. Genet Med. 2015;17:822–30. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources