Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;39(13):e70059.
doi: 10.1002/jcla.70059. Epub 2025 May 31.

Significance of Inflammation Markers to Predict Curative Treatment for Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance

Affiliations

Significance of Inflammation Markers to Predict Curative Treatment for Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance

Yenigürbüz Serkan et al. J Clin Lab Anal. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Active surveillance (AS) strategy aims to avoid unnecessary or excessive early treatment in patients at a low risk for prostate cancer (PCa). However, a biomarker that can predict the need for early curative treatment in patients under AS has not been identified to date. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential of inflammatory biomarkers in predicting the requirement of curative treatment in the early period in patients under AS.

Materials and methods: This study included a total of 83 patients with the diagnosis of PCa and under AS. Patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume (PV), PSA density (PSAD), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and follow-up period were compared between the groups.

Results: There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of PSAD, NLR, PLR and SII (p = 0.037, p = 0.046, p = 0.008, p = 0.004 and p = 0.005, respectively). The cut-off value determined by performing ROC analysis to evaluate the levels that predict the need for curative treatment before AS was 0.125 for PSAD (sensitivity: 61.8%, specificity: 61.2%), 2.01 for NLR (sensitivity: 67.6%, specificity: 55.1%), 115.49 for PLR (sensitivity: 73.5%, specificity: 59.2%) and 465.40 for SII (sensitivity: 70.6%, specificity: 59.2%).

Conclusions: The analysis of PSAD, NLR, PLR and SII before making the decision to conduct AS can guide clinicians regarding curative treatment in the early period.

Keywords: active surveillance; biomarkers; inflammation mediators; prostatic neoplasms; tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to report.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of patients included and not included in the study.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
ROC graph of PSAD, NLR, PLR and SII to evaluate their efficacy in predicting the need for curative treatment in patients with PCa under AS.

Similar articles

References

    1. Pernar C. H., Ebot E. M., Wilson K. M., and Mucci L. A., “The Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 8 (2018): 1–19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boniol M., Boyle P., Autier P., Ruffion A., and Perrin P., “Critical Role of Prostate Biopsy Mortality in the Number of Years of Life Gained and Lost Within a Prostate Cancer Screening Programme,” BJU International 110 (2012): 1648–1652. - PubMed
    1. Heijnsdijk E. A., Wever E. M., Auvinen A., et al., “Quality‐of‐Life Effects of Prostate‐Specific Antigen Screening,” New England Journal of Medicine 367 (2012): 595–605. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loeb S., Bjurlin M. A., Nicholson J., et al., “Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer,” European Urology 65 (2014): 1046–1055. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ganz P. A., Barry J. M., Burke W., et al., “National Institutes of Health State‐Of‐The‐Science Conference: Role of Active Surveillance in the Management of Men With Localized Prostate Cancer,” Annals of Internal Medicine 156 (2012): 591–595. - PMC - PubMed

Substances