Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jul;34(7):2972-2980.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08953-3. Epub 2025 May 31.

Tubular versus unilateral biportal endoscopy: MRI analysis after unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Tubular versus unilateral biportal endoscopy: MRI analysis after unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis

Nicolas Ross et al. Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis frequently requires surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. Minimally invasive techniques such as unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression have largely replaced traditional open laminectomy because of effective decompression and reduced tissue damage. This study compared the radiological and clinical outcomes of tubular decompression and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) in patients with severe stenosis.

Methods: This was a retrospective, monocentric, nonrandomized study including 103 patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis (52 tubular decompression, 51 UBE) from July 2020 to April 2024. The primary radiological outcomes were changes in anteroposterior diameter and dural sac surface area, assessed by MRI. Clinical outcomes included operative time, complication rates, and patient-reported outcomes with the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale for pain, evaluated preopertatively, 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

Results: As compared with tubular decompression, UBE resulted in a more significant increase in anteroposterior diameter (+ 4.9 vs. + 3.75 mm, p < 0.001) and dural sac surface area (+ 95.8 vs. + 85.4 mm², p = 0.038). However, with both techniques, clinical improvements were similar at 3 and 12 months, with no significant difference in Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale score, or patient satisfaction. The complication rate, including reoperation, was low in both groups, but the incidence of symptomatic hematoma was higher with UBE than tubular decompression.

Conclusion: Both tubular decompression and UBE were effective for spinal stenosis treatment, with UBE providing superior radiological decompression, even in the early learning phase. However, the techniques were comparable in clinical outcomes at 3 months and 1 year. Further studies are needed to assess long-term results and refine patient selection criteria.

Keywords: Endoscopy; Lumbar stenosis; Spine surgery; Tubular retractor; Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Arbit E, Pannullo S (2001) Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review. Clin Orthop:137–143
    1. Ammendolia C, Stuber KJ, Rok E, Rampersaud R, Kennedy CA, Pennick V et al Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD010712. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010712
    1. Phan K, Mobbs RJ (2016) Minimally invasive versus open laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Spine 41:E91–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001161 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nerland US, Jakola AS, Solheim O, Weber C, Rao V, Lønne G et al (2015) Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study. BMJ 350:h1603. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1603 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ahn Y (2019) Current techniques of endoscopic decompression in spine surgery. Ann Transl Med 7:S169. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.07.98 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources