Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 1;3(1):47.
doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00168-4.

Effectiveness of a community health advisor colorectal cancer screening educational intervention on stool test completion in an African American primary care patient population: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

John S Luque  1 , Gebre-Egziabher Kiros  2 , Matthew A Vargas  2 , Askal Ali  3 , Rima Tawk  2 , Deloria R Jackson  2 , Sabrina L Dickey  4 , Cynthia M Harris  2 , Temple Robinson  5 , Bessie Duncan  5 , Jeanne' Freeman  6 , Clement K Gwede  7 , Kristin Wallace  8   9
Affiliations

Effectiveness of a community health advisor colorectal cancer screening educational intervention on stool test completion in an African American primary care patient population: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

John S Luque et al. BMC Glob Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) disparities in incidence and mortality for African Americans compared to white Americans are explained by socioeconomic, behavioral, biological, and cultural factors in addition to lower screening rates and lower stage-specific survival. The behavioral clinical trial, "Test Up Now Education Program" (TUNE-UP) tested a community health advisor (CHA) intervention to increase stool-based screening in African American patients of community health centers (CHC) in Florida.

Methods: Participants who were not up to date with CRC screening were randomized to two study arms after completing a baseline survey. The two experimental arms were (1) an intervention group which received adapted "Screen to Save" CRC education, a tailored brochure, and CHA education; and (2) a control group which received the brochure only. Participants were surveyed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months follow-up. The primary outcome was completion of the stool test within the last year, measured by self-report. The secondary outcomes were CRC knowledge, CRC perceived susceptibility, and CRC screening self-efficacy. For each arm, the proportion of participants who received CRC screening by 12 months was calculated. McNemar's chi-square test was used to test changes in dichotomous outcomes related to CRC screening. For outcome variables measured on a continuous scale, a paired t-test was applied to compare changes in mean values. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were used to compare effects of the intervention on secondary outcomes, adjusting for covariates and confounding factors.

Results: At 12 months (n = 93), completion of the stool test increased significantly among participants in both study arms, showing no difference; 27 out of 45 (60%) participants in the intervention group and 28 out of 48 (58%) participants in the control group (p = 0.87).The intervention had a significant effect on the two secondary outcomes of CRC knowledge (p = 0.03) and CRC perceived susceptibility (p < 0.001) after adjusting for the covariates and confounders included in the model.

Conclusions: The trial demonstrated CHCs can increase CRC screening among African Americans who were not up to date in receiving recommended screening.

Trial registration: The clinical trial was registered on March 11, 2020 under the identifier https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04304001 .

Keywords: African Americans; Cancer prevention; Colorectal cancer screening; Generalized estimating equations; Randomized controlled trial; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Florida A&M University Institutional Review Board (IRB#1439452–2). The project coordinator obtained informed consent from eligible participants following a determination of eligibility for trial participation. The trial was registered with the clinicaltrials.gov website under protocol number NCT04304001 on March 11, 2020. The research conformed to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Flow Diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2024;74(1):12–49. 10.3322/caac.21820. - PubMed
    1. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965–77. 10.1001/jama.2021.6238. - PubMed
    1. Carethers JM. The Jeremiah Metzger Lecture: Environmental Influences on Colorectal Cancer. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2024;134:181–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O'Sullivan DE, Sutherland RL, Town S, Chow K, Fan J, Forbes N, et al. Risk Factors for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(6):1229–40 e5. 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.01.037. - PubMed
    1. Carethers JM, Doubeni CA. Causes of Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer and Intervention Framework and Strategies. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(2):354–67. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.029. - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources