Nutritional priorities to support GLP-1 therapy for obesity: a joint Advisory from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and The Obesity Society
- PMID: 40450457
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.04.023
Nutritional priorities to support GLP-1 therapy for obesity: a joint Advisory from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, the American Society for Nutrition, the Obesity Medicine Association, and The Obesity Society
Abstract
Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and combination medications (hereafter collectively referred to as GLP-1s) are shifting the treatment landscape for obesity. However, real-world challenges and limited clinician and public knowledge on nutritional and lifestyle interventions can limit GLP-1 efficacy, equitable results, and cost-effectiveness.
Objectives: We aimed to identify pragmatic priorities for nutrition and other lifestyle interventions relevant to GLP-1 treatment of obesity for the practicing clinician.
Methods: An expert group comprising multiple clinical and research disciplines appraised the scientific literature, informed by expert knowledge and clinical experience, to identify and summarize relevant topics, priorities, and emerging directions.
Results: GLP-1s reduce body weight by 5% to 18% in trials, with modestly lower effects in real-world analyses, and multiple demonstrated clinical benefits. Challenges include side effects, especially gastrointestinal; nutritional deficiencies due to calorie reduction; muscle and bone loss; low long-term adherence with subsequent weight regain; and high costs with resulting low cost-effectiveness. Numerous practice guidelines recommend multicomponent, evidence-based nutritional and behavioral therapy for adults with obesity, but use of such therapies with GLP-1s is not widespread. Priorities to address this include: (a) patient-centered initiation of GLP-1s, including goals for weight reduction and health; (b) baseline screening, including usual dietary habits, emotional triggers, disordered eating, and relevant medical conditions; (c) comprehensive exam including muscle strength, function, and body composition assessment; (d) social determinants of health screening; (e) and lifestyle assessment including aerobic activity, strength training, sleep, mental stress, substance use, and social connections. During GLP-1 use, nutritional and medical management of gastrointestinal side effects is critical, as is navigating altered dietary preferences and intakes, preventing nutrient deficiencies, preserving muscle and bone mass through resistance training and appropriate diet, and complementary lifestyle interventions. Supportive strategies include group-based visits, registered dietitian nutritionist counseling, telehealth and digital platforms, and Food is Medicine interventions. Drug access, food and nutrition insecurity, and nutrition and culinary knowledge influence equitable obesity management with GLP-1s. Emerging areas for more study include dietary modulation of endogenous GLP-1, strategies to improve compliance, nutritional priorities for weight maintenance post-cessation, combination or staged intensive lifestyle management, and diagnostic criteria for clinical obesity.
Conclusions: Evidence-based nutritional and lifestyle strategies play a pivotal role to address key challenges around GLP-1 treatment of obesity, making clinicians more effective in advancing their patients' health.
Keywords: clinical care; glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists; lifestyle; nutrition; obesity.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest Dr. Mozaffarian reports research funding from the National Institutes of Health, Kaiser Permanente Fund at the East Bay Community Foundation, National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation, GoogleHealth, and The Rockefeller Foundation; scientific Advisory board, Beren Therapeutics, Brightseed, Calibrate, Elysium Health, Filtricine, HumanCo, Instacart Health, January Inc., WndrHLTH; scientific consulting, Amazon Health; equity in Calibrate and HumanCo; and chapter royalties from UpToDate. Dr. Apovian reports research funding from PCORI and GI Dynamics, Inc.; and Advisory boards for Altimmune, Inc., Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BioAge, Biolinq Incorporated, Caribou Biosciences, Inc., CinFina Pharma, Inc., Covidien LP, Cowen and Company, LLC, Currax Pharmaceuticals, LLC, EPG Communication Holdings Ltd., Form Health, Inc., Fractyl Health, Inc., LillyUSA, LLC, L-Nutra, Inc., Mediflix Inc., NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., NodThera Limited, Nutrisystem, OptumRx, Inc., Pain Script Corporation, Palatin Technologies, Inc., Pursuit By You, Redesign Health Inc., ReShape Lifesciences Inc., Riverview School, Roman Health Ventures Inc., Scholar Rock, Inc., Terns, Inc., Verily Life SciencesLLC, Veru Inc., Vida Health, Inc., Wave Life Sciences, Xeno Biosciences and Zyversa Therapeutics, Inc. Dr. Butsch reports Advisory boards for Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Abbott and Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Christensen reports Advisory boards and speakers bureau for Novo Nordisk and speakers bureau for Eli Lilly. Dr. Kane reports research funding by the Ardmore Institute of Health. Dr. Stanford reports research funding from the National Institutes of Health; and scientific Advisory boards for Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Amgen, Pfizer, Currax, Calibrate, Vida Health, Ilant Health, Mellicell, Sweetch, Doximity, GoodRx, Empros Pharma, Clearmind Medicine, and Apnimed. The other authors report no disclosures. Dr. Alexander reports advisory board for Novo Nordisk and Speaker's Bureau for Eli Lilly.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
