Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 1;30(1):46.
doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01757-w.

Neuroimaging and machine learning in eating disorders: a systematic review

Affiliations

Neuroimaging and machine learning in eating disorders: a systematic review

Francesco Monaco et al. Eat Weight Disord. .

Abstract

Purpose: Eating disorders (EDs), including anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED), are complex psychiatric conditions with high morbidity and mortality. Neuroimaging and machine learning (ML) represent promising approaches to improve diagnosis, understand pathophysiological mechanisms, and predict treatment response. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the application of ML techniques to neuroimaging data in EDs.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD42024628157), we systematically searched PubMed and APA PsycINFO for studies published between 2014 and 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed human studies using neuroimaging and ML methods applied to AN, BN, or BED. Data extraction focused on study design, imaging modalities, ML techniques, and performance metrics. Quality was assessed using the GRADE framework and the ROBINS-I tool.

Results: Out of 185 records screened, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most applied support vector machines (SVMs) or other supervised ML models to structural MRI or diffusion tensor imaging data. Cortical thickness alterations in AN and diffusion-based metrics effectively distinguished ED subtypes. However, all studies were observational, heterogeneous, and at moderate to serious risk of bias. Sample sizes were small, and external validation was lacking.

Conclusion: ML applied to neuroimaging shows potential for improving ED characterization and outcome prediction. Nevertheless, methodological limitations restrict generalizability. Future research should focus on larger, multicenter, and multimodal studies to enhance clinical applicability.

Level of evidence: Level IV, multiple observational studies with methodological heterogeneity and moderate to serious risk of bias.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Eating disorders; Machine learning; Neuroimaging; Predictive analytic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA search process

References

    1. Hamatani S, Hirano Y, Sugawara A et al (2021) Eating Disorder Neuroimaging Initiative (EDNI): a multicentre prospective cohort study protocol for elucidating the neural effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders. BMJ Open. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042685 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nagy H, Paul T, Jain E, Loh H et al (2022) A clinical overview of anorexia nervosa and overcoming treatment resistance. Avicenna J Med. 10.1055/s-0042-1758859 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clemente-Suárez VJ, Ramírez-Goerke MI, Redondo-Flórez L et al (2023) The impact of anorexia nervosa and the basis for non-pharmacological interventions. Nutrients 15:2594 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stice E, Marti CN, Spoor S et al (2008) Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: long-term effects from a randomized efficacy trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 76:329–340. 10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.329 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giel KE, Bulik CM, Fernandez-Aranda F et al (2022) Binge eating disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 10.1038/s41572-022-00344-y - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms