Attitudes towards different weight loss approaches among adults with type 2 diabetes and obesity
- PMID: 40451037
- PMCID: PMC12315052
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109193
Attitudes towards different weight loss approaches among adults with type 2 diabetes and obesity
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to understand how patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity view weight loss treatments (lifestyle changes, metabolic bariatric surgery [MBS], and anti-obesity medications [AOM]) in the context of shared decision-making conversations.
Methods: Patients (N = 30) with T2D and obesity participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews focused on attitudes and informational needs related to MBS, AOM, and lifestyle approaches, as well as comfort in discussing weight loss with primary care clinicians (PCCs). Themes were generated using inductive content analysis.
Results: Two main themes emerged: (1) The way PCCs and patients discuss weight loss in the context of diabetes influence patients' willingness to try weight loss treatments, and (2) although patients' attitudes towards treatments vary, most patients prefer using lifestyle changes first, then AOM, and finally MBS. Within the first theme, subthemes included PCCs need to approach weight loss conversations with sensitivity and tangible solutions; personal stories influence attitudes towards MBS and AOM; patients may be more open to trying MBS and AOM if they are reframed as treatments for diabetes; and patients want to compare risks and benefits of each option.
Conclusions: Patients with T2D and obesity are open to discussing weight loss with their PCCs and prefer lifestyle approaches, followed by AOM and then MBS. PCCs may use these findings to improve the quality of shared decision-making conversations about weight loss in T2D.
Practice implications: Providing information to support shared decision-making about weight loss treatments is warranted.
Keywords: Attitudes; Diabetes; Obesity treatment; Primary care; Qualitative methods.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39051876
-
Weight loss interventions for chronic asthma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD009339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009339.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22786526 Free PMC article.
-
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38837220 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35802350 Free PMC article.
-
Contraceptive Decision-Making Among Young College Men and Women in Ethiopia: Results of the Qualitative Study.Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231177848. doi: 10.1177/00469580231177848. Inquiry. 2023. PMID: 37249097 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Svanevik M, Lorentzen J, Borgeraas H, et al. Patient-reported outcomes, weight loss, and remission of type 2 diabetes 3 years after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy (Oseberg); a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Aug 2023;11(8):555–566. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00127-4 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical