Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 1;15(2):58-65.
doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202506_15(2).0003.

Comparing Performance Outcomes of Emergency Medicine-Trained vs. Non-Emergency Medicine-Trained Physicians in Emergency Departments

Affiliations

Comparing Performance Outcomes of Emergency Medicine-Trained vs. Non-Emergency Medicine-Trained Physicians in Emergency Departments

Chia-Wei Hong et al. J Acute Med. .

Abstract

Background: Non-emergency medicine (EM)-trained physicians comprise a notable proportion of the emergency medicine workforce in Taiwan and many other countries. The possible performance differences at the emergency department (ED) between EM-trained and non-EM-trained physicians have not been evaluated before.

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted between August 2018 and July 2020 at a regional hospital in Taiwan. We compared the two physician groups for quality-of-care outcomes, including waiting time, rate of failing to visit patients within the required time, length of ED stay, admission rate, intensive care unit admission rate, unscheduled return visit, return of spontaneous circulation rate in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, in-hospital cardiac arrest incidence, referral rate, and computed tomography (CT) scan utilization.

Results: A total of 37,013 ED visits were included. When compared to the non-EM-trained physicians, patients managed by the seven EM-trained physicians had shorter waiting time (6.1 min vs. 9.2 min, p < 0.001), shorter ED stay (146.5 min vs. 176.1 min, p < 0.001), lower rate of failing to visit patients within the required time (0.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.010), lower unscheduled return visit rate (4.9% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.043), and lower CT scan utilization (0.16 [times/patient/visit] vs. 0.18 [times/patient/visit], p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The EM-trained and non-EM-trained physicians' performance at a regional hospital ED differed. Our findings could be used as a reference for healthcare policy-makers and hospital management.

Keywords: Keywords: emergency department; emergency medicine training; performance difference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Study flow diagram.
ED: emergency department; OBS: obstetric; y/o: years old; EM: emergency medicine.

References

    1. Counselman FL, Babu K, Edens MA, et al. The 2016 model of the clinical practice of emergency medicine. J Emerg Med . 2017;52:846-849. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.01.040 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shivraj P, Chadha R, Novak AR, et al. Knowledge, judgment, and skills in reproductive health care and abortion are essential to the practice of obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol . 2023;141:676-680. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pek JH, Lim SH, Ho HF, et al. Emergency medicine as a specialty in Asia. Acute Med Surg . 2016;3:65-73. doi: 10.1002/ams2.154 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hori S. Emergency medicine in Japan. Keio J Med . 2010;59:131-139. doi: 10.2302/kjm.59.131 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hall MK, Burns K, Carius M, Erickson M, Hall J, Venkatesh A. State of the national emergency department workforce: who provides care where? Ann Emerg Med . 2018;72:302-307. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.03.032 - DOI - PubMed