Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 8;14(4):103316.
doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103316. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Radiofrequency Controlled Ablation Technique for Arthroscopic Meniscectomy of the Knee

Affiliations

Radiofrequency Controlled Ablation Technique for Arthroscopic Meniscectomy of the Knee

Amber Carroll et al. Arthrosc Tech. .

Abstract

Despite mixed responses in the literature regarding knee arthroscopies, radiofrequency (RF) ablation remains a preferred method for partial meniscectomy of the knee. This technique is believed to offer advantages over traditional shaving methods, such as reduced risk of long-term fissure propagation and enhanced precision. However, existing literature does not yield a conclusive status of RF's risk-benefit profile, contributing to a mixed response to its recognized utility and safety in the arthroscopic community. This article details a procedure for performing partial meniscectomy with RF ablation using a feedback-controlled bipolar RF device (WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand; ArthroCare/Smith & Nephew, Austin, TX), with a focus on parameters that can influence intervention safety. These parameters include device-specific factors such as energy transmission type and field density, as well as surgeon-specific factors such as rest/shutoff time, translation speed, and instrumentation depth. Postoperative care typically involves physical therapy, emphasizing early mobilization and strengthening exercises to ensure optimal recovery. Although our clinic has observed positive results with feedback-controlled bipolar RF for partial meniscectomy, further studies are necessary to conclusively determine the risk-benefit profile of this technique, including long-term follow-up to assess durability and patient satisfaction. Additionally, comparisons with other techniques could provide a more comprehensive understanding of its efficacy and overall impact on patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: C.M. reports that financial support was provided by Smith & Nephew; reports a consulting or advisory relationship with Smith & Nephew; and receives speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement from Smith & Nephew. Both other authors (A.C., C..B.) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Coronal-plane cut: anterior view of meniscal lesion in left knee via magnetic resonance imaging. The increased signal intensity, visible as white/cloudy content inside the dark triangle (arrow), identifies the lesion. (LFC, lateral femoral condyle.)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Sagittal-plane cut: lateral view of meniscal lesion in left knee via magnetic resonance imaging. The increased signal intensity, visible as white/cloudy content inside the dark triangle (arrow), identifies the lesion.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Arthroscopic anterior view of left knee via lateral portal showing wave lesion (WL) located on lateral meniscus (LM), as evidenced by superior translation of compromised tissue, creating shaded edge on posterior aspect. (LFC, lateral femoral condyle; TP, tibial plateau.)
Fig 4
Fig 4
Arthroscopic anterior view of left knee via lateral portal showing feedback-controlled bipolar radiofrequency ablation device (WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand) (RF) inserted via medial portal in position near wave lesion (WL) and ready for instrumentation. Feedback-controlled bipolar devices are becoming the more dominant expression of arthroscopic radiofrequency ablation because their use reduces potentially harmful energy transference to viable adjacent tissue as compared with monopolar or bipolar devices. (LFC, lateral femoral condyle; LM, lateral meniscus.)
Fig 5
Fig 5
Arthroscopic anterior view of left knee via lateral portal showing feedback-controlled bipolar radiofrequency ablation device (WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand) (RF) during initial stages of intervention. One should note the 1- to 3-mm distance between the probe tip and the target tissue, as well as no red flash at the end of the probe tip, signifying that the device is in the “shutoff” cycle. Minimal to no instances of direct contact and intermittent shutoff times of 1 to 3 seconds are recommended to reduce the risk of energy overexposure to the surrounding viable tissue. (LFC, lateral femoral condyle; LM, lateral meniscus; WL, wave lesion.)
Fig 6
Fig 6
Arthroscopic anterior view of left knee via lateral portal showing feedback-controlled bipolar radiofrequency ablation device (WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand) (RF) progressing through intervention. One should note that the device has moved to another region of the target tissue, while the former target region (oval) is not fully ablated. This highlights another technique feature that limits energy overexposure, that is, the brush technique, oscillating over various portions of the target region with a translation speed of 1 to 3 mm/s. The device will oscillate over various target regions until the intervention is complete. (LFC, lateral femoral condyle; LM, lateral meniscus.)
Fig 7
Fig 7
Arthroscopic anterior view of left knee via lateral portal showing feedback-controlled bipolar radiofrequency ablation device (WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand) (RF) returning back to original target site to complete ablation process for this region. One should note a red flash at the probe tip, signifying that the device is actively ablating tissue. Throughout the intervention, the device, turned on, creates a localized plasma field that ablates the target tissue through reactive plasma species bombardment. (LFC, lateral femoral condyle; LM, lateral meniscus; WL, wave lesion.)
Fig 8
Fig 8
Arthroscopic anterior view of left knee via lateral portal showing target region beginning to reach tissue smoothing phase (oval), observed by beginning changes in coloration of meniscal rim as compared with surrounding meniscal tissue. Tissue smoothing is the chondral matrix realignment that is proposed to reduce long-term fissure propagation potential. (LFC, lateral femoral condyle; LM, lateral meniscus; RF, feedback-controlled bipolar radiofrequency ablation device [WEREWOLF FLOW50 Wand].)
Fig 9
Fig 9
Arthroscopic anterior view of knee via lateral portal showing entire target region reaching satisfactory level of tissue smoothing (oval), which signals completion of procedure. The smoothed region can be observed by the increased yellowish discoloration along the meniscal rim as compared with the surrounding meniscal tissue. Tissue smoothing is a chondral matrix realignment that is proposed to reduce long-term fissure propagation potential. (LFC, lateral femoral condyle; LM, lateral meniscus; TP, tibial plateau.)

Similar articles

References

    1. Anderson D.E., Rose M.B., Wille A.J., Wiedrick J., Crawford D.C. Arthroscopic mechanical chondroplasty of the knee is beneficial for treatment of focal cartilage lesions in the absence of concurrent pathology. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tuthill T., Jackson G.R., Schundler S.F., et al. Radiofrequency chondroplasty of the knee yields excellent clinical outcomes and minimal complications: A systematic review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023;5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Piper D., Taylor C., Howells N., Murray J., Porteous A., Robinson J.R. Use of a novel variable power radiofrequency ablation system specific for knee chondroplasty: Surgical experience and two-year patient results. Cureus. 2021;13 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stalder K.R., McMillen D.F., Woloszko J. Electrosurgical plasmas. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2005;38:1728–1738.
    1. Allen R.T., Tasto J.P., Cummings J., Robertson C.M., Amiel D. Meniscal debridement with an arthroscopic radiofrequency wand versus an arthroscopic shaver: Comparative effects on menisci and underlying articular cartilage. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:385–393. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources