Does the Addition of an Adjuvant Superficial Cervical Plexus Block to Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Enhance Intraoperative Pain Control in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery? A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 40453617
- PMCID: PMC12122964
- DOI: 10.1007/s12663-025-02505-4
Does the Addition of an Adjuvant Superficial Cervical Plexus Block to Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Enhance Intraoperative Pain Control in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Introduction: Accessory innervation from the cervical plexus is attributed as a plausible explanation for inadequate pain control during surgical removal of mandibular impacted third molars. This study assessed the effectiveness of adjuvant superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) to the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for managing intraoperative pain during mandibular third molar surgery.
Materials and methods: A double-blind, randomized trial with 64 patients undergoing mandibular third molar surgery was divided into two groups of 32 patients. Group A received IANB alone, while Group B received IANB with SCPB. Intraoperative pain was the primary outcome, measured by visual analogue scale. Pain on the first and fifth post-operative days was a secondary outcome. Paired t-tests analysed the data, with p < 0.05 indicating significance.
Results: Statistical analysis revealed that Group A patients who received only IANB had significantly higher VAS pain scores both during the intraoperative procedure and on the first post-operative day (P < 0.05) compared to Group B who received the adjuvant SCPB injection.
Conclusion: Combining SCPB with IANB effectively reduced intraoperative pain during mandibular impacted tooth removal and improved patient comfort on the first post-operative day. This highlights SCPB's value as an adjuvant for better pain management in mandibular third molar surgery.
Keywords: Accessory innervation; Adjuvant injection; Inadequate anaesthesia; Intraoperative pain control; Mandibular third molar surgery; Superficial cervical plexus block.
© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2025. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors are solely responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The authors have no affiliation with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
References
-
- Kaufman E, Weinstein P, Milgrom P (1984) Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 108:205–208 - PubMed
-
- Martinez Gonzalez JM, Benito Pena B, Fernandez Caliz F et al (2003) A comparative study of direct mandibular nerve block and the Akinosi technique. Med Oral 8:143–149 - PubMed
-
- Altug HA, Sencimen M, Varol A et al (2012) The efficacy of mylohyoid nerve anesthesia in dental implant placement at the edentulous posterior mandibular ridge. J Oral Implantol 38:141–147 - PubMed
-
- Nusstein JM, Reader A, Drum M (2010) Local anesthesia strategies for the patient with a “hot” tooth. Dent Clin N Am 54(2):237–247 - PubMed