Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 15;9(5):igaf026.
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf026. eCollection 2025.

Virtual Data Collection Strategies in Research on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD)

Jeong Eun Kim  1 , Melissa Knox  1 , Joshua D Grill  2   3 , Megan Witbracht  3 , Yuchen Zhang  1 , Hector Salazar  1 , Marita Garrett  1 , Eunji Russ  3 , Melany Medina  3 , Jennifer H Lingler  1   4
Affiliations

Virtual Data Collection Strategies in Research on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD)

Jeong Eun Kim et al. Innov Aging. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Remote data collection emerged as a valuable method for engaging vulnerable populations, such as individuals participating in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) research. Despite challenges like technology readiness and privacy concerns, remote methods have the potential to enhance participation among diverse groups by offering flexibility while addressing accessibility barriers such as geographic distance. This study shares experiences with virtual data collection and the strategies employed to enhance ADRD research involving individuals with and at risk of cognitive impairment.

Research design and methods: Experiences are drawn from RIDE (Recruitment Innovations for Diversity Enhancement), an online survey study to assess interest in ADRD research participation among presumably unimpaired adults identifying as Black or African American; and PARADE (Patient and Family Member Reactions to Biomarker-Informed ADRD Diagnoses), an observational, longitudinal cohort study of individuals receiving a biomarker-informed diagnosis for cognitive impairment and their care partners. We detail approaches employed across recruitment, data collection, to retention stages.

Results: Virtual data collection was highly feasible in both studies, successfully engaging participants in ADRD research, including those from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups. In RIDE, although project staff occasionally needed to troubleshoot technical challenges (e.g., broken survey links, video issues), the study successfully recruited 500 adults identifying as Black/African American. PARADE showed that synchronous interviews minimized missing data, with care partners providing essential technical and logistical support. Despite occasional difficulties with video conferencing and participant payments, most participants remained fully engaged, highlighting the effectiveness of virtual methods and the need for continuous support to ensure successful participation.

Discussion and implications: Virtual data collection offers opportunities to promote inclusion in ADRD research, as demonstrated by the successful enrollment of diverse participant samples in both studies. Successful implementation requires careful planning to address challenges such as digital literacy, educational disparities, and technical support.

Keywords: Care partners; Dyad; Videoconferencing; Virtual engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J. H. Lingler has provided paid consultation to Biogen and Genentech. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Presentation slides shared with participants during synchronous survey data collection.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ahmad, N. A., Mat Ludin, A. F., Shahar, S., Mohd Noah, S. A., & Mohd Tohit, N. (2022). Willingness, perceived barriers and motivators in adopting mobile applications for health-related interventions among older adults: A scoping review. BMJ Open, 12(3), e054561. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054561 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arce Rentería, M., Mobley, T. M., Evangelista, N. D., Medina, L. D., Deters, K. D., Fox-Fuller, J. T., Minto, L. R., Avila-Rieger, J., & Bettcher, B. M. (2023). Representativeness of samples enrolled in Alzheimer’s disease research centers. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 15(2), e12450. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/dad2.12450 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox, C. G., Ryan, M. M., Gillen, D. L., & Grill, J. D. (2021). Is reluctance to share Alzheimer’s disease biomarker status with a study partner a barrier to preclinical trial recruitment? Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease, 8(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/ 10.14283/jpad.2020.36 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dos Santos Marques, I. C., Theiss, L. M., Johnson, C. Y., McLin, E., Ruf, B. A., Vickers, S. M., Fouad, M. N., Scarinci, I. C., & Chu, D. I. (2021). Implementation of virtual focus groups for qualitative data collection in a global pandemic. American Journal of Surgery, 221(5), 918–922. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dubé, M. -O., Meziane, R. S., Hudon, A., Cavallo, S., Verduyckt, I., & Zidarov, D. (2023). Virtual synchronous qualitative data collection methods used in health and social sciences: A scoping review of benefits, challenges and practical insights. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 22. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/16094069231214679 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources