Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 2;167(1):160.
doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06574-9.

Adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization for non-acute subdural hematoma: A GRADE-assessed meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis on randomized trials

Affiliations
Review

Adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization for non-acute subdural hematoma: A GRADE-assessed meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis on randomized trials

Mohamed S Elgendy et al. Acta Neurochir (Wien). .

Abstract

Background and purpose: Non-acute subdural hematoma (NASDH) is a prevalent neurological condition, encompassing chronic and subacute types. Despite standard-care, including surgical evacuation and medical management, recurrence rates remain high. Emerging evidence suggests that middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) as an adjunctive procedure may reduce recurrence. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of MMAE in NASDH.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, Scopus, and Cochrane until November 2024. The analysis presented risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using R software. The GRADE system assessed evidence certainty, alongside trial sequential analysis for result reliability.

Prospero id: CRD42024625504.

Results: Six RCTs and 1,544 patients were included, with an average of 4.7 months follow-up. Adjunctive MMAE, compared to standard-care, significantly reduced hematoma recurrence (8% vs 15.6%; RR: 0.52; 95% CI: [0.37:0.73]; P < 0.01) and surgical rescue (4.5% vs. 12.7%; RR: 0.36; 95% CI: [0.25:0.53]; P < 0.01). However, no significant effect was found for recurrence without surgery (P = 0.94), hematoma volume (P = 0.18), thickness (P = 0.34), or hospital stay (P = 0.37). Infection rates were higher with MMAE (8.4% vs. 4.8%; RR: 1.81; 95% CI: [1.23:2.66]; P < 0.01), but adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, intracranial hemorrhage, stroke, and mortality showed no significant differences.

Conclusion: Adjunctive MMAE reduced hematoma recurrence and surgical rescue rates in NASDH with an acceptable safety profile despite increased infection rates. However, further large-scale trials with extended follow-ups are needed.

Keywords: Brain injury; Clinical trial; Embolization; Neurovascular; Subdural hematoma; Trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval: Not applicable. Consent to publish: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart for the systematic search and selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot for clinical efficacy outcomes. MMAE middle meningeal artery embolization, MH Mantel–Haenszel, CI confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot for rates of infections and infestations, total adverse events (AEs), total serious AEs, intracranial hemorrhage, and stroke. MMAE middle meningeal artery embolization, MH Mantel–Haenszel, CI confidence interval
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot for rates of death (any cause, disease-related, and neurological causes). MMAE middle meningeal artery embolization, MH Mantel–Haenszel, CI confidence interval

Similar articles

References

    1. Bartek J, Biondi A, Bonhomme V, Castellan L, Catapano G, Cenzato M et al (2024) Multidisciplinary consensus-based statement on the current role of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) in chronic SubDural hematoma (cSDH). Brain and Spine 4:104143. 10.1016/j.bas.2024.104143 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Catapano JS, Koester SW, Srinivasan VM, Rumalla K, Baranoski JF, Rutledge C et al (2022) Total 1-year hospital cost of middle meningeal artery embolization compared to surgery for chronic subdural hematomas: a propensity-adjusted analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 14(8):804–806. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018327 - PubMed
    1. Davies JM, Knopman J, Mokin M, Hassan AE, Harbaugh RE, Khalessi A et al (2024) Adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization for subdural hematoma. N Engl J Med [Internet] 391(20):1890–1900. 10.1056/NEJMoa2313472 - PubMed
    1. Debs LH, Vale FL, Walker S, Toro D, Mansouri S, Macomson SD et al (2024) Middle meningeal artery embolization following surgical evacuation of symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma improves outcomes, interim results of a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Neurosci 128:110783. 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110783 - PubMed
    1. Désir LL, D’Amico R, Link T, Silva D, Ellis JA, Doron O, et al. Middle meningeal artery embolization and the treatment of a chronic subdural hematoma. Cureus. 2021;13(10). 10.7759/cureus.18868 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources