Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jun 2;20(1):47.
doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00618-2.

Prioritizing circulation over airway to improve survival in trauma patients with exsanguinating injuries: a world society of emergency surgery-panamerican trauma consensus statement

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prioritizing circulation over airway to improve survival in trauma patients with exsanguinating injuries: a world society of emergency surgery-panamerican trauma consensus statement

Paula Ferrada et al. World J Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Hemorrhage is one of the leading causes of preventable death in trauma patients. For decades, the Airway-Breathing-Circulation (ABC) approach has been the cornerstone of trauma care. However, emerging evidence suggests that prioritizing airway management in exsanguinating patients may worsen hypotension and increase mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the Circulation-Airway-Breathing (CAB) approach compared to the traditional ABC sequence in improving survival in trauma patients with severe hemorrhage.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE, SCOPUS, web of science and EMBASE were searched for studies published up to September 2024. Eligible studies included observational and comparative studies reporting outcomes of trauma patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for risk of bias assessment. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) for mortality, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the ABC and CAB approaches in prospective and retrospective studies.

Results: Six studies (N = 11,855 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a significant increase in mortality associated with the ABC approach (pooled OR: 3.65, 95% CI: 1.74-7.65). Subgroup analysis of prospective cohort studies found an even higher mortality risk (POR: 9.99, 95% CI: 5.59-17.85) when compared with POR of retrospective studies (POR: 2.42, 95%CI: 1.08-5.36). High heterogeneity (I2 = 92%) was observed across the studies, likely due to variations in patient populations and resuscitation protocols.

Conclusion: Prioritizing circulation over airway management in trauma patients with exsanguinating injuries significantly reduces mortality compared to the traditional ABC approach. The present consensus paper, conducted according to the WSES methodology3, aims to provide a review of the literature comparing the CAB approach to the traditional ABC sequence in trauma patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage, to develop a shared consensus statement based on the currently available evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This is a consensus statement and does not require an ethics declaration. “Ethics declaration: Not applicable”. Competing interests: There are no competing interests or conflicts of interest to declare pertinent to this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart diagram describing the identification, screening, and selection of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (SR and MA) for assessing the risk of mortality among exsanguinating hemorrhage patients in trauma, (n = 6 studies)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest Plot with individual (OR) and pooled effect size (POR) with 95%CI and study’ weights: meta-analysis of the risk of mortality among trauma patients (N = 5 studies)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Forest plot for exploratory sub-group analysis with prospective cohort studies comparing the risk of mortality between ABC and CAB approach (N = 2). b Forest plot for exploratory sub-group analysis with retrospective cohort studies comparing the risk of mortality between ABC and CAB approach (N = 3)

References

    1. 10th Edition of the Advanced Trauma Life Support ® (ATLS ® ) Student Course Manual. Chicago (IL): American College of Surgeons; 2018.
    1. Ferrada P, Dissanaike S. Circulation first for the rapidly bleeding trauma patient—it is time to reconsider the ABCs of trauma care. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(8):884–5. 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.8436. - PubMed
    1. Bala M, Kashuk J, Moore EE, Catena F, Leppaniemi A, Ansaloni L, et al. Establishing position papers by the WSES. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–6. 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;29(372): n71. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources