Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 2;14(1):61.
doi: 10.1186/s13756-025-01575-w.

Strengthening neonatal care through ward assistants: a Kenyan case study in enhancing infection prevention and control practices

Affiliations

Strengthening neonatal care through ward assistants: a Kenyan case study in enhancing infection prevention and control practices

Michuki Maina et al. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. .

Abstract

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) is a critical component of neonatal care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where healthcare settings face unique challenges. Neonates, especially preterm and low birth weight infants, are at higher risk for infections, including healthcare-associated infections. In Kenya, neonatal units struggle with limited resources, understaffing, and shortages of essential supplies, significantly impeding effective IPC practices.

Methods: This study employed a mixed methods approach in four public neonatal units in Kenya to assess the impact of deploying ward assistants on IPC practices. Data collection included structured and unstructured observations, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions with healthcare workers and caregivers. The intervention aimed to address gaps in routine cleanliness, waste management, and adherence to IPC protocols.

Results: The introduction of ward assistants led to noticeable improvements in overall ward cleanliness and waste disposal, highlighting the potential for enhanced infection control. Mothers' hand hygiene practices improved, driven by targeted sensitization efforts. Despite these gains, significant challenges remained. Hand hygiene adherence among healthcare providers was inconsistent, and equipment cleaning and decontamination were frequently compromised by insufficient supplies and overwhelming patient demand. The findings underscored the critical role of resources and the need for consistent supervision and training to support sustainable IPC improvements.

Conclusion: Deploying ward assistants in neonatal units can positively influence IPC practices, particularly in addressing environmental cleanliness and waste management. However, these benefits alone are insufficient to address systemic barriers to IPC, including resource constraints and variability in adherence among staff. To sustain these gains, robust training, consistent supervision, and adequate resourcing are imperative. Future research should explore the long-term impact of such interventions and design context-specific strategies to overcome persistent barriers, ensuring safer neonatal care in resource-limited settings.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Keywords: Health workforce; Infection prevention; Neonatal care; Quality of care; Ward assistants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was part of a larger project that evaluated the effects of technology and workforce enhancement to support neonatal hospital care in Kenya. This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. It received approvals from the Institution Review Boards (IRB); Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (KEMRI/SERU/CGMR-C/229/4203) and the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (Reference- 26 − 21). Additionally, we received approvals from the individual counties and health facilities where the research was conducted. Informed consent was obtained prior to data collection (observations, interviews and focus group discussions) from all the target participants. To maintain confidentiality, no personal identifiers were collected and, in the data presented here, all the study hospitals are de-identified. Consent for publication: All the authors reviewed and approved this manuscript for publication. This work is published with the permission of the director of KEMRI. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mothers hand hygiene performance
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Hand hygiene performance among clinicians and students

References

    1. UNICEF. Neonatal mortality 2024 [cited 2024 June 21st]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/neonatal-mortality/
    1. Irimu G, Aluvaala J, Malla L, Omoke S, Ogero M, Mbevi G, et al. Neonatal mortality in Kenyan hospitals: a multisite, retrospective, cohort study. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6(5):e004475. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsafaras GP, Ntontsi P, Xanthou G. Advantages and limitations of the neonatal immune system. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maina M, Tosas-Auguet O, McKnight J, Zosi M, Kimemia G, Mwaniki P, et al. Evaluating the foundations that help avert antimicrobial resistance: performance of essential water sanitation and hygiene functions in hospitals and requirements for action in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0222922. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NEST360. NEST360 2021 [Available from: https://nest360.org/.

LinkOut - more resources