Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 19;6(3):318-323.
doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0673. eCollection 2025 May.

Evaluation of methane mitigation by organic feed additives in dual-flow continuous culture

Affiliations

Evaluation of methane mitigation by organic feed additives in dual-flow continuous culture

B A Wenner et al. JDS Commun. .

Abstract

Sustainability is interwoven with consumer expectations of organic production systems, yet there are few nutritional options for organic dairy systems to approach methane (CH4) mitigation. The objective of the current study was to compare 3 feed additives for CH4 mitigation. We hypothesized that each additive would decrease CH4 production in continuous culture when compared with a control diet. Using dual-flow continuous culture fermenters fitted for CH4 and hydrogen (H2) sampling, 4 treatments were arranged in a 4 × 4 Latin square design. Treatments were a negative control (CON, 60:40 concentrate:orchardgrass pellet mix, 17.1% CP, 33.0% NDF, 20.1% ADF, and 27.1% starch) fed twice daily a total 80 g/d DM (CON) and comparing one of the 3 additives: kelp powder (KP) at 1.7 g/d, essential oils (EO) at 3 mg/d, or pistachio-based biochar (BC) at 1.6 g/d. All dosages were calculated based on previous data and supplier recommendations scaled to dual-flow continuous culture functional volume. Experimental periods included 7 d of adaptation and 4 d of sampling (11 d total), and buffer and solids dilution rates were maintained at 7%/h and 5%/h, respectively. The main statistical model included fixed effect of treatment and random effects of fermenter and period. Gas production data were measured by feeding; thus, analysis included a repeated effect of feeding and hourly VFA samples a repeated effect of hour. Only EO decreased CH4 production compared with CON (43.1 vs. 47.4 mmol/feeding, SD: 3.96). There was no effect of treatment on H2 emission, nor H2 or CH4 in the aqueous phase. There was also no effect of treatment on nutrient digestibility despite large numerical differences in fiber digestibility, nor the production of primary VFA. However, KP decreased production of isobutyrate and isovalerate compared with CON. While the present data illustrate efficacy of an essential oil product to decrease CH4 emission, decreases in CH4 were not supported by statistically significant gains in VFA that could translate to increased milk production in the dairy cow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Summary: This study aimed to evaluate the ability of 2 commercially available products and 1 product in a developmental stage to decrease methane production within the US organic dairy industry. Dual-flow continuous culture fermenters were fed 1 of 3 different organic feed additives at the recommended dose compared with a control (no additive) in a Latin square design. Only 1 organic feed additive, an essential oil blend, was effective in decreasing daily methane production at modest levels. There were no other effects of note on microbial fermentation or nutrient digestibility. In the current dairy market, decreased methane production without offsetting improvements in nutrient digestibility or utilization must be compensated in some other way in order to warrant implementation on farms.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Design and specifications for the “half moon” clamp added to dual-flow continuous culture system previously described by Hoover et al. (1976) and Wenner et al. (2021b). Clamps were first used in Mitchell et al. (2023) and improved sealing and eliminate need for thick lids described in Wenner et al. (2021b).

References

    1. Belanche A., Newbold C.J., Morgavi D.P., Bach A., Zweifel B., Yanez-Ruiz D.R. A Meta-analysis describing the effects of the essential oils blend Agolin Ruminant on performance, rumen fermentation and methane emissions in dairy cows. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:620. doi: 10.3390/ani10040620. 32260263. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benchaar C., Greathead H. Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011;166–167:338–355. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.024. - DOI
    1. Bica R., Palarea-Albaladejo J., Lima J., Uhrin D., Miller G.A., Bowen J.M., Pacheco D., Macrae A., Dewhurst R.J. Methane emissions and rumen metabolite concentrations in cattle fed two different silages. Sci. Rep. 2022;12 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09108-w. 35361825. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carrazco A.V., Peterson C.B., Zhao Y., Pan Y., McGlone J.J., DePeters E.J., Mitloehner F.M. The impact of essential oil feed supplementation on enteric gas emissions and production parameters from dairy cattle. Sustainability (Basel) 2020;12 doi: 10.3390/su122410347. - DOI
    1. Castillejos L., Calsamiglia S., Ferret A., Losa R. Effects of dose and adaptation time of a specific blend of essential oil compounds on rumen fermentation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007;132:186–201. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.03.023. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources