Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 30;21(3):15563316251340983.
doi: 10.1177/15563316251340983. Online ahead of print.

Robotic-Assisted Arthroscopy Promises Enhanced Procedural Efficiency, Visualization, and Control but Must Overcome Barriers to Adoption

Kyle N Kunze  1 , David Ferguson  2 , Ayoosh Pareek  1 , Nicholas Colyvas  3
Affiliations
Review

Robotic-Assisted Arthroscopy Promises Enhanced Procedural Efficiency, Visualization, and Control but Must Overcome Barriers to Adoption

Kyle N Kunze et al. HSS J. .

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery is now well-established in spine surgery and total joint arthroplasty, but its application to arthroscopy has only recently emerged in the context of advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic technology. This new application addresses limitations of conventional arthroscopy, including constrained depth perception, variation in technique or anatomy leading to inaccuracies, manual fluid management adjustments, and limitations in dexterity due to the requirement that one hand is occupied by the arthroscope. Early preclinical and cadaveric studies demonstrate submillimeter precision and improved anatomic accuracy in procedures such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, but widespread clinical adoption remains limited by regulatory, economic, and training hurdles. This review article synthesizes the capabilities and applications of current robotic-assisted arthroscopy platforms, surveys the landscape of available technologies, and examines barriers to adoption, thereby looking ahead to the potential use of this technology in redefining arthroscopic surgery.

Keywords: arthroscopy; artificial intelligence; computers in medicine; robotics/CAOS; sports.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: David Ferguson, MD, declares no potential conflicts of interest. Kyle N. Kunze, MD, and Ayoosh Pareek, MD, report relationships with AllaiHealth Inc. Nicholas Colyvas, MD, reports relationships with Bioquiddity and Convergence Medical.

References

    1. Afifi A, Takada C, Yoshimura Y, Nakaguchi T. Real-time expanded field-of-view for minimally invasive surgery using multi-camera visual simultaneous localization and mapping. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21:2106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antico M, Sasazawa F, Dunnhofer M, et al. Deep learning-based femoral cartilage automatic segmentation in ultrasound imaging for guidance in robotic knee arthroscopy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46:422–435. - PubMed
    1. Banach A, Strydom M, Jaiprakash A, et al. Visual localisation for knee arthroscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021;16:2137–2145. - PubMed
    1. BenMessaoud C, Kharrazi H, MacDorman KF. Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: Contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e16395. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bozkurt M, Apaydin N, Isik C, Bilgetekin YG, Acar HI, Elhan A. Robotic arthroscopic surgery: A new challenge in arthroscopic surgery part-i: Robotic shoulder arthroscopy; a cadaveric feasibility study. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7:496–500. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources