Bioethical Considerations of Deploying Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Orthopedic Settings: A Narrative Review
- PMID: 40458232
- PMCID: PMC12126464
- DOI: 10.1177/15563316251340303
Bioethical Considerations of Deploying Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Orthopedic Settings: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged in orthopedics with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, optimize surgical workflows, and support personalized care. We conducted a narrative review exploring the bioethical considerations of AI use in the orthopedic clinical setting, focusing on 4 core principles-autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice-to provide orthopedists with a practical framework for AI's implementation. We utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework to conduct a comprehensive PubMed search; 89 articles were evaluated and 23 met our inclusion criteria. Across these studies, bioethical considerations for the clinical implementation of AI tools consistently emerged, most commonly concerning privacy, bias, transparency, informed consent, and regulation. We offer recommendations for strengthening privacy safeguards, adopting bias mitigation strategies, improving transparency through explainable AI tools, and establishing clear regulatory frameworks with lifecycle evaluation.
Keywords: AI; artificial intelligence; bioethics; ethical considerations; machine learning; orthopedics.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Christian A. Pean, MD, reports relationships with Arthrex Inc, Heraeus Medical LLC, Smith+Nephew Inc., ENCORE MEDICAL, LP, TriCoast Surgical Solutions LLC, Stryker Corporation, and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.; he is also co-founder and CEO of an AI company, RevelAi Health. The other authors report no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: A Review Bridging Innovation and Clinical Practice for the Next Generation of Surgical Care.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 16;14(8):2729. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082729. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40283559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making in Oncology: A Review of Ethical, Legal, and Informed Consent Challenges.Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01698-8. Online ahead of print. Curr Oncol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40526332 Review.
-
Balancing Ethics and Innovation: Can Artificial Intelligence Safely Transform Emergency Surgery? A Narrative Perspective.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 30;14(9):3111. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093111. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40364137 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection and its health technology assessment: A scoping review.Comput Biol Med. 2025 Jan;184:109391. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109391. Epub 2024 Nov 22. Comput Biol Med. 2025. PMID: 39579663
-
Ethical and privacy challenges of integrating generative AI into EHR systems in Tanzania: A scoping review with a policy perspective.Digit Health. 2025 May 20;11:20552076251344385. doi: 10.1177/20552076251344385. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40400763 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Banatwala U, Ibrahim MT, Shaikh RH, Shahzad H, Hoodbhoy Z, Noordin S. A comprehensive exploration of artificial intelligence in orthopaedics within lower-middle-income countries: a narrative review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2024;74(Suppl 4):S90–S96. - PubMed
-
- BBC. Google DeepMind NHS app test broke UK privacy law. 2017. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-40483202. Accessed January 3, 2025.
-
- Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous